Does Israel's immigration problem sound familiar?

The Israeli immigration minister Eli Yishai has announced his firm intention to deport all illegal aliens because their presence “damages the state’s Jewish identity, constitute a demographic threat and increase the danger of assimilation.”

The demand of Israel to be a Jewish state underpins the existence of that nation — and is identical to the British National Party’s demand for Britain to remain an ethnically majority British state.

Speaking to the Israeli media after refusing to concede on demands for the children of illegal immigrants to be made exempt from deportation proceedings, Mr Yishai said he was adamant over his decision that all illegal foreign workers and their families must leave the country.

“Minister Yishai is not ready to give a permanent residency to these children. Their parents, who are staying illegally, are using their children to whitewash their presence,” Mr Yishai’s spokesman, Roee Lahmanovitz told the media.

“Allowing this group residency would create a dangerous precedent which could eventually fundamentally change the Jewish character of Israel,” he said.

“We are not a safe haven, period. We should not damage the character of the Jewish state simply out of clemency.”

Allowing these children to stay in Israel “is liable to damage the state’s Jewish identity, constitute a demographic threat and increase the danger of assimilation,” Mr Yishai added later. “We are not an asylum state.”

According to official figures, some 222,000 foreign workers live in Israel, including 107,000 who have exceeded their work permits. These illegal aliens come from countries as widely disparate as Ghana and the Philippines.

The arrival of hundreds of thousands of foreign workers has already transformed many streets of the once predominantly Tel Aviv into a series of Asian and African food stores, restaurants, Internet cafes and karaoke bars.

Israel issues work visas for nearly 30,000 foreign workers every year and many stay in the country once the visas expire. Several years ago, the Israeli government ordered a crackdown on the illegal immigrant problem, and created a new unit to deal with it.

Further reading: United Nations Charter 21 - Sustainable development a global plan page 15

3.7. Sustainable development must be achieved at every level of society. Peoples' organizations, women's groups and non-governmental organizations are important sources of innovation and action at the local level and have a strong interest and proven ability to promote sustainable livelihoods. Governments, in cooperation with appropriate international and non-governmental organizations, should support a
community-driven approach to sustainability, which would include, inter alia:

a. Empowering women through full participation in decision-making;

b. Respecting the cultural integrity and the rights of indigenous people and their communities;

You will note that Governments are:

a) Empowering women and ethnic groups and any other minority case or head case or nutter with a grievance and a placard in his hands, but that they are NOT adhering to b) To respect the cultural integrity and the rights of indigenous people and their communities.

Instead, they are SMASHING THEM!

Is the Munzenburg 'Franfurt School Conspiracy' really happening?

What was the Frankfurt School? Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not do so. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons. On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted. To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things): LINK

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces

• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

Hat tip: Incog Man

France adopts immigration policy similar to the BNP

France to launch national pride campaign in battle against Islamic fundamentalism
By Peter Allen
Last updated at 1:39 AM on 27th

France is to adopt a series of measures to 'reaffirm pride' in the country and combat Islamic fundamentalism.
They include everybody receiving lessons in the nation's Christian history and children singing the national anthem.
Using words which infuriated ethnic minority groups and Socialist opponents, immigration minister Eric Besson also said he wanted 'foreigners to speak better French'.


He called for all recent arrivals to be monitored by 'Republican godfathers', charged with helping immigrants to integrate better.
His proposed measures contrast sharply with the situation in Britain where 'citizenship education' centres on multicultural diversity.
M Besson, who was born in the former French protectorate of Morocco, suggested a debate on national identity' entitled 'What does it mean to be French?'
He also reignited the debate about face and body-covering Muslim veils, saying they should definitely be banned.
As well as providing civic lessons for adults - including classes about the country's Christian history and liberal political institutions - the government will encourage school children to sing the national anthem at least once a year.
His proposed measures contrast sharply with the situation in Britain where 'citizenship education' centres on multicultural diversity and the European Union, while 'God Save The Queen' is not even taught in schools.

In an interview broadcast on national TV, Mr Besson said : 'It's necessary to reaffirm the values of national identity and the pride of being French.
'I think, for example, that it would be good for all young French people to have the chance to sing The Marseillaise at least once a year.'

Making clear that radical Islam was a threat, Mr Besson said: 'In France, the nation and the republic remain the strongest ramparts against ... fundamentalist tendencies. France is diversity, and France is unity.'


Mr Besson defended a decision to send illegal Afghan immigrants - all of them Muslim - back to Kabul on charter flights organised in conjunction with the British government last week, saying there would be many more.

More than 21,000 people have been deported from France this year - with 27,000 the ultimate target, said Mr Besson.

He also reignited the debate about face and body-covering Muslim veils, saying they should definitely be banned.
'For me, there should be no burqas on the street,' said Mr Besson. 'The burqa is against national values - an affront to women's rights and equality.'

Explaining the apparent shift to the extreme right by President Nicolas Sarkozy's government, Mr Besson evoked the legacy of Jean Marie Le Pen's anti-immigration National Front party, which is struggling massively with huge debts and low electoral support.
Mr Besson said: 'We should never have abandoned to the National Front a number of values which are part of the Republic's heritage. I think that the political death of the National Front would be the best news for all of us.'

But Mohammed Moussaoui, a prominent French Muslim leader, said debates like the one about the burqa were stigmatizing the country's entire Muslim community, which at some five million is the largest in western Europe.

LINK

Klaus asks for referendum on Lisbon Treaty

From The Times today

Václav Klaus, the Czech President, who is the last hurdle to full ratification of the Lisbon treaty, has made a final attempt to derail the agreement.

In a submission to the Czech constitutional court, which will decide tomorrow whether the treaty is compatible with the country’s constitution, Mr Klaus has suggested that it should be subject to a referendum.

The President, who is the only head of state yet to sign the treaty, attacked the EU notion of “shared sovereignty” as a contradiction that effectively means a loss of national control.

President Klaus made his written statement in support of a case against the treaty brought by 17 Czech senators, who have asked judges to rule that the agreement is unconstitutional because it transfers powers to Brussels. He also asked for a ruling on whether the treaty changed the terms of the Czech Republic’s accession to the EU in 2004 so significantly that a new referendum should be ordered.

Have you heard about the European Union and "Communitarianism" yet?

Communitarianism is a “Big Brother knows best” type of philosophy. Barack Obama is a Fabian Communitarian, although you will not have heard him use the term during his election campaign. Americans will get a shock when the truth of his hidden agenda becomes known and they find out his real intentions. Bear in mind that Obama is simply a front-man for the New World Order Communitarians.

Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants.

In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.

For an excellent overview of what is going on, see The EU Communitarian Agenda and The New Feudalists. Matthew D. Jarvie’s “The Fabian Society, Communitarianism and the New World Order” video. An economic overview of the NWO (from a US perspective): The International Forecaster. Slightly OT, here is sound advice from someone who understands the economics of what is going on (also from a US perspective): Europac (Peter Schiff). Quotes “In a communitarian society, which is inherently coercive, it isn’t just the majority view that prevails and becomes policy, the majority view is the only one which can be spoken, the only one which can be even heard.” Medawar “Communitarianism is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism.” Black Crayon “…ideology of ‘civic society’ (or communitarism), which is nothing less than one version of post-Marxist collectivism which wants privileges for organized groups, and in consequence, a refeudalization of society.”

Vaclav Klaus “In general communitarians emphasize society rather than the individual and believe that group responsibilities (to family, community, nation, the globe) should trump individual rights.” Libertarians vs. Communitarians “Communitarianism is not about ‘the common good’. It’s about power and the absolute and dictatorial control of money and people – nothing more and nothing less.” Communitarianism – the dictatorship of everything “The communitarians work behind the scenes. Élite communitarian ‘thinkers’ quietly slide their new laws inside projects and programs few regular folks will think (or dare) to question. And, just so you won’t look any closer, (or open your mouth to ask one dumb question) the communitarians mask their fascist programs behind all kinds of lovely phrasing.

The new phrases work so well that if you do speak up with a debateable question, it means you don’t want to live in a ’safe and healthy community.’ And since everyone has to agree in order to reach communitarian consensus, you will be shunned and excluded from the decision making ‘councils’ that control the new districts. Go ahead and try, but the shifty communitarians will NEVER debate you because their programs are based entirely in a lie called communism.” The Anti-Communitarian League (ACL) “We are witnessing a seizure and redirection of power through legitimate means. This is not a dictatorship but something more complex: the tyranny of popularity.”

Utopian Delusions – Communitarianism “There has been very little systematic criticism of ideological communitarianism, if only because its exact premises and policy consequences are difficult to pin down. Those wary of it tend to be individualist thinkers who worry that self-described communitarians are actually stealth collectivists; or, more plausibly, that the main effect of well-intentioned communitarian rhetoric is to provide cover for collectivists with a much farther-reaching and harsher agenda than the communitarians intend.”

Wikipedia – Communitarianism “The Communitarian pitch to balance rights and responsibilities thus masks an attempt to shift the basic nature of rights and responsibilities from individuals to the community, i.e. to the state.” Rights, Responsibilities, and Communitarianism “The cult television series ‘The Prisoner’ tells the story of a man who, after losing and then regaining consciousness, opens the blinds of his London flat to find that the world outside has undergone a Kafkaesque transformation: the skyscrapers and city streets visible from his window have been replaced with a small and serene village. (2) Accompanying this stark change in his external environment is a sharp decrease in his freedom. Whereas his life in London was his own, he discovers upon venturing out into the village (3) that his decisions and actions are now community property. He is watched everywhere he goes both by neighbors and hidden cameras. (4) He is expected to be an enthusiastic participant in all communal events, and is ostracized as ‘unmutual’ when he instead seeks out privacy and seclusion. (5) The town’s authorities are intent on ensuring that residents cannot opt out of village life: quaint taxis transport people within the village, but never outside of it; phone service is strictly local; maps at the village store show nothing beyond the community’s boundaries. (6) Each showing of independence or defiance by the protagonist brings strong pressure from the authorities to fully account for (and recant) his actions. (7) In short, his familiar urban life is replaced with a communitarian dystopia, hostile to privacy and deeply suspicious of every act of individuality.”

The dangers of fighting terrorism with technocommunitarianism

Hat tip: London Patriot

Labour traitors ignore the British people at your peril

Unbelievable as it sounds, the current Labour government conspired to keep secret from the British people for 10 years, its plans to rid Britain of its own culture by allowing unrestricted control of immigration under the guise of "cultural diversity". It imposed laws to postively discriminate against the British people and it took decisions without mandate from the British people, to rid them of their sovereign rights to govern themselves.



Labour
By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 6:42PM BST 23 Oct 2009

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

"I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date."

The "deliberate policy", from late 2000 until "at least February last year", when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a "driving political purpose" behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

But he acknowledged that "nervous" ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

"Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.

"But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland."

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: "Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite.

"Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.

"This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: "We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.

"It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain."

Ex Labour Minister Frank Field MP asks "Are we as a nation lost"

St Crispin's Day and The Battle of Agincourt

What's he that wishes so?
My cousin Westmoreland? No, my fair cousin:
If we are mark'd to die, we are enow
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God's will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
Such outward things dwell not in my desires:
But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive.
No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England:
God's peace! I would not lose so great an honour
As one man more, methinks, would share from me
For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made
And crowns for convoy put into his purse:
We would not die in that man's company
That fears his fellowship to die with us.
This day is called the feast of Crispian:
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when the day is named,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say 'To-morrow is Saint Crispian:'
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars.
And say 'These wounds I had on Crispin's day.'
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot,
But he'll remember with advantages
What feats he did that day: then shall our names.
Familiar in his mouth as household words
Harry the king, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester,
Be in their flowing cups freshly remember'd.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remember'd;
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition:
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.

The Battle of Agincourt was an English victory against a larger French army in the Hundred Years' War. The battle occurred on Friday 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day), in northern France.Henry V's victory started a new period in the war, in which Henry married the French King's daughter and his son was made heir to the throne of France, but his achievement was squandered by his heirs, notably Henry VI.

While Henry V led his troops into battle and actually participated in hand to hand fighting, the French king of the time, Charles VI, did not command the French army himself as he suffered from mental illness and delusions which rendered him incapacitated. Instead the French were commanded by Constable Charles d'Albret and various prominent French noblemen of the Armagnac party.

The battle is notable for the use of the English longbow, which Henry used in very large numbers, with English and Welsh longbowmen forming the vast majority of his army. The battle is the centrepiece of the play Henry V, by William Shakespeare.

Non nobis and te deum
Non nobis, non nobis, Domine - Not to us, not to us, o Lord,
Sed nomini tuo da gloriam - But to your name give glory.

Labour Immigration Policy

Occ67 Migration

UK Govt "conspires" against the people with Mass Immigration Plan

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed. LINK

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 6:42PM BST 23 Oct 2009

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

"I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date."

The "deliberate policy", from late 2000 until "at least February last year", when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a "driving political purpose" behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

But he acknowledged that "nervous" ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

"Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.

"But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland."

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: "Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite.

"Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.

"This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: "We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.

"It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain."

London has been "ethnically cleansed" says Nick Griffin

Conservative Party leader accused of sponsoring fascist "mob"

Future PM candidate and current Conservative Party leader is accused of sponsoring an angry mob in protest against BNP leader Nick Griffin who appeared on BBC debate Question Time. During the protests, 3 police were injured and one was hospitalised with head injuries. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKP6SvK7jgA

This is United Kingdom "Democracy".



BNP response LINK

The BBC broke every rule in its book, even changing the format of the show to allow a hand-picked mob to use up the entire hour to relentlessly attack BNP leader Nick Griffin. Even the supposed moderator, David Dimbleby, joined in the attack, refusing to allow Mr Griffin to answer a single question in full — despite letting other panellists ramble on for minutes at a time.

Mr Griffin said this morning that he was going to submit a formal complaint and a Freedom of Information Act request to have the preparatory papers for the show exposed to the public.

“There we will see that the BBC not only changed the format of the show, but that the questions were primed to be a barrage of lies disguised as statements,” Mr Griffin said.

The normal format of the show is to discuss issues of the day. Last night’s show was merely a prepared bear pit with a hostile hand-picked audience and panel, exactly as Mr Griffin had earlier predicted it would be.

At one stage, the ‘moderator’ allowed three highly charged questions in a row attacking Mr Griffin. When the BNP leader started to answer the first one, Mr Dimbleby interrupted and refused to let Mr Griffin continue his answer or even begin to answer the other two.

“People wanted to see me and hear me talking about things such as the postal strike. One or two questions about what a ‘wicked man’ I am, fair enough, but the whole programme, that was absurd,” Mr Griffin said.

In addition to the complaint he would be lodging over the show, Mr Griffin called for the entire event to be “done again. But let’s do it properly this time,” he said.

Mr Griffin said the viewing public had tuned in, wanting to hear the BNP’s policies and views on immigration, the postal strike, the illegal war in Afghanistan and other issues of the day.

“Instead they got none of that, merely a list of statements, almost none of which were even questions,” Mr Griffin said.

“I could also sit and prepare an hour of statements about other panel members if given the opportunity,” he said. “I could say that Mr Jack Straw was a member of the Young Communist League as a student.

“I could say that ‘Baroness’ Warsi has never been elected to anything and was told to stand down in Dewsbury by her own party because they wanted a white person as candidate.

“If I had to abuse the public broadcaster to do that, they would squeal like pigs. Yet this was exactly what was done to me,” Mr Griffin said.

He added that the programme should have been filmed somewhere else because London was “not my country any more. Why not come down and do it in Thurrock, do it in Stoke, do it in Burnley?

“Do it somewhere where significant numbers of English and British people still live, somewhere where they haven’t been ethnically cleansed from their own country.”

Mr Griffin said that the biased nature of the programme was obvious to all viewers and that this would generate further support for the BNP as it was now clear to all exactly how the other parties gladly teamed up against him.

* The BBC said it had received more than 350 complaints after the show was broadcast by midday today — the bulk of which accused the show of being biased against the BNP and/or Mr Griffin.

* £5,300 was raised in donations over the party’s web site. This does not include the call centre, whose figures are not yet available. The combined hit rate climbed to just over 15 million for the past three days. The Alexa web ranking for 20 October placed the BNP website as the 11,468 most visited site in the world, a number which will certainly climb as the figures are updated.

British Government Ignorant over Immigration Problem

COMMENTARY

By Sir Andrew Green
Chairman of Migration Watch UK
The Daily Mail, London, 22 October, 2009

The figures on population trends mark a watershed in the debate on immigration.

They are the last estimates that will be made public before the election - and they make grim reading. Mass immigration, which has been encouraged by Labour's policy of open borders, has already brought three million immigrants to Britain since it came to power in 1997.

These projections confirm that immigration is driving our population to new heights. If nothing is done, we will have an extra 10million people within 25 years - and nearly 70 per cent of them as a result of new immigration.

Overcrowding: Immigration is driving our population to new heights

The conspiracy of silence among the main political parties on this vitally important subject cannot be allowed to continue. They must face up to the huge impact that immigration will have on the future of our society - and especially on England, which is the destination for more than 90 per cent of foreign migrants…

See the Full Article LINK

Official Statistics Published Today Show Immigration Will Add Just Under 7 Million To The UK Population In The Next 25 Years
October 21, 2009
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of think tank MigrationwatchUK, said:

"The Government is in denial about the impact of immigration on our population growth."

"Seventy per cent of the fastest growth rate in history is due to immigration."

"That is equivalent to the entire population of London in the next 25 years."

"The Government's own claim for the effect of their recent measures is an annual reduction of 20,000. Today's projections show that net immigration must be reduced by 180,000 a year if we are to hold the UK's population at 65 million."

"Government measures are just scratching at the surface. Really serious measures are needed, and soon." LINK

UAF crash through BBC barrier to protest against BNP

BNP website makes a case for Nationalist Politics - BNP Website declares:-

Are you sick and tired of being treated like a second-class citizen in your own country? Are you angered by rising crime, corruption, immigration and media lies? Have you had enough of being called a ‘racist’ because you are proud to be British? Are you sickened by the politicians stealing your money in fiddled expenses whilst you struggling to pay the bills? Have you had enough of watching foreigners come here and take our jobs and housing? Are you disgusted that the super-rich banks have been bailed out but unemployed people and pensioners get hardly anything?

The British National Party is made up of ordinary people just like YOU who have had enough! We have had enough of watching our country being turned into a third-world slum – we want a future for our children and we want British people put first in our own country.

Hundreds of anti-fascist protesters gathered outside the west London studios of the British Broadcasting Corporation ahead of a pre-taped appearance on "Question Time" by British National Party leader, Nick Griffin.

Demonstrators and police engaged in some shoving outside the gates of BBC Television Centre Thursday afternoon, and "a small number" of protesters managed to get into the building before being "escorted" out, the broadcaster said in a written statement.

Pictures broadcast on the BBC showed several protesters being dragged bodily from the building by police.

Mr Griffin is a familiar face in British politics, if at the very fringes. He was elected leader of the British National Party in the late 1990s, not long after being convicted of inciting racial hatred relating to material denying the Holocaust. He was cleared of race hate offenses in 2006 after the BBC secretly filmed him telling a crowd that Islam was a "wicked, vicious faith." He campaigns against immigration and asks on his Web site: "Have you had enough of being called a 'racist' because you are proud to be British?"

Hat Tip CNN News - Video from Sky News

These last few days have shown a remarkable upsurge in online support for the British National Party and for Mr Griffin's appearance on BBC Newsnight. An online BBC poll showed 85% were in favour of his appearance on the weekly political studio debate with many comments nominating lack of democratic mandate for British membership of the European Union, a lack of democracy generally, and a further unwillingness of the main party leaders to tackle what to many is an overwhelming immigration problem in Britain as the main reasons for their support.

BNP Leader Nick Griffin describes "indigenous"

"It's about culture not the colour of someone's skin"
"We're just as opposed to mass immigration from all white Poland as we are from Nigeria. People from anywhere on the planet can assimilate and are assimilable in small numbers but we are opposed to mass immigration. If you look at somewhere like Bradford, that is colonisation not immigration and it's out of control"

50 Days to save the world Brown says as he warns of a "catastrophe"

PM warns of climate 'catastrophe' LINK

The UK faces a "catastrophe" of floods, droughts and killer heatwaves if world
leaders fail to agree a deal on climate change, the prime minister has warned.

Gordon Brown said negotiators had 50 days to save the world from global
warming and break the "impasse".

He told the Major Economies Forum in
London, which brings together 17 of the world's biggest greenhouse gas-emitting
countries, there was "no plan B".

World delegations meet in Copenhagen
in December for talks on a new treaty.

'Rising wave'

The United Nations (UN) summit will aim to establish a deal to replace
the 1997 Kyoto treaty as its targets for reducing emissions only apply to a
small number of countries and expire in 2012.

Mr Brown warned that
negotiators were not reaching agreement quickly enough and said it was a
"profound moment" for the world involving "momentous choice".

"In
Britain we face the prospect of more frequent droughts and a rising wave of
floods," he told delegates.

"The extraordinary summer heatwave of 2003
in Europe resulted in over 35,000 extra deaths.

Grim
warning

"On current trends, such an event could become quite
routine in Britain in just a few decades' time. And within the lifetime of our
children and grandchildren the intense temperatures of 2003 could become the
average temperature experienced throughout much of Europe."

The costs of
failing to tackle the issue would be greater than the impact of both world wars
and the Great Depression combined, the prime minister said.

The world
would face more conflict fuelled by climate-induced migration if a deal was not
agreed, he added.

He told the forum, on the second day of talks in the
capital, that by 2080 an extra 1.8 billion people - a quarter of the world's
current population - could lack sufficient water.

Mr Brown said: "If we
do not reach a deal at this time, let us be in no doubt: once the damage from
unchecked emissions growth is done, no retrospective global agreement, in some
future period, can undo that choice.

"So we should never allow ourselves
to lose sight of the catastrophe we face if present warming trends continue."

Agreement at Copenhagen "is possible", he concluded.

"But we
must frankly face the plain fact that our negotiators are not getting to
agreement quickly enough. So I believe that leaders must engage directly to
break the impasse."

In recent days there have been a number of warnings
that progress is stalling.

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, told Newsweek magazine "the prospects
that states will actually agree to anything in Copenhagen are starting to look
worse and worse".

The Major Economies Forum is not part of the formal UN
process and so firm commitments are unlikely to come from the meeting.

It is seen instead as a gathering where countries can explore options
and positions in a less pressured environment.

Is Global warming a natural phenomenon? LINK

Well the truth is I don't know, but what I do know is that most politicians accept it is man made yet have not given us the scientific arguments like the guys in the above link who ARE actually scientists who dispute it. They say it is simply the sun and earth shift and say that CO2 in the atmosphere is not only not responsible but wish we had more of it!

Where then is the truth?

Well those of us still alive in 2012 will find out I guess and we'll probably be able to ask our politicians, if the earth is warming up to such an extent, why we have gas bills through the roof and why we're all freezing to death on account of poor summers. We can also ask why they are selling all the energy facilities off to private buyers instead of placing them under "emergency control", and why there are buyers wanting to buy energy plants presumably to make money with energy plans through until the year 2025.

However IF our planet IS going into catastrophic decline and 1.6 billion people are going to die, then at least we'll be able to spot our politicians more easily when we ask why they didn't look at this problem much earlier and whether they still think it's a good idea to fleece the people for taxes, cripple their societies with all manner of stupid decisions and whether they plan to reduce my council tax!

Are the Tories in decline?

They may win the next election but that doesn't really tell us they satisfied the public. Clearly the present first past the post system coupled with boundry changes and a system which really places a party into government with something near a third of the electoral vote, cannot be described as a "win". Technically yes, but in reality NEVER.

Cameron has waited too long and tried to be too clever. It has been his undoing as people are impatient. They also see a complete lack of spunk and determination along with barely a hint, if any, of any principled stand. They see policy driven by underlings and by small minded committees and think tanks instead of their leader. They see minorities with too much say and a leader who panders to them. They do not believe him!

Why should they believe him or even trust him when he shows no leadership? Why should they rest their lives in his hands to deliver policies that amount mainly to "trust me"?

Who can the people turn to on the Lisbon Treaty and Europe, immigration, crime and their schools being infested with Marxists?

People are continuing to wake up politically and want a new way based on honesty and democracy. It's quite simple really, all politicians have to do is to represent what policies people want instead of trying to persuade them to accept something dreamt up just to catch their vote.

Policies based on core Conservative principles would be my key to being elected and that means satisfying the argument over our sovereignty, our culture, our democracy, our political future and our economy and clearing out those who disagree with the fundamental principles of what made this country British.

Without these policy aims, votes will continue to decline.

Radio Leicester discusses multicultural Britain

The EU and Ethnocide by David Morris

By David Morris – LINK

Now that we have two members of the EU Parliament, the possibility of saving Europe and her peoples has become a reality. One of the situations they face is the fact that the media are torn between their duty of informing the public and their wanting to keep sensitive information quiet so they can present other ethnic groups as better than us.
However, information does come out in bits and we can piece it together to build up an accurate picture of what is really going on. What I say to people is don’t believe the media and don’t take my word for something. Look for yourselves — there is much information on the Internet.
The central issue of the dominant ideology is identity — what we are. This encompasses race, followed by gender and orientation. News is managed and EU schemes to discriminate against whites are kept quiet or presented in idealistic language. People can not revolt against something if they do not know it is happening.
What is really happening?
Throughout Europe there is a developing war on the streets for possession of the Continent. This is mainly against European people but anti-Semitism is being introduced too. There are almost continuous riots in France and vicious attacks on white and Jewish people which the controlled media tries to hide. In Sweden young white women are hunted down and raped by Muslims. It is also not safe for Jewish people to go out in identifying clothes, but the authorities try to suppress knowledge of this. The Express of 26 February 2009 reported that “British Muslims” were snipers and bomb-makers killing our troops in Afghanistan. Army eavesdropping operations have heard British accents among Taliban forces. These are the first stirrings of a British racial civil war. EU rulers know this but still encourage immigration.In Luton some local Muslims protested against the parade of local regiment The Royal Anglians, or “The Poachers”, on their return from Iraq. English people fought back but the police protected the Muslims and arrested a young Englishman, although the CPS later dropped the charges. These warning signs are ignored.
During the Muslim-Socialist protests against Israel’s raids on Gaza last January, protesters throughout Europe and in London openly chanted “Jews to the gas” while the police looked on. And still the rulers import more Muslim terrorists and anti-Semites.
To prevent Geert Wilders speaking at the House of Lords, Muslim peer Lord Ahmed threatened to bring 10,000 Muslim protesters outside the Lords.The elites submitted to Saudi when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities. Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, explained that if the case continued, “British lives on British streets” would be at risk.
What is behind the surrender? Well, decadence and, of course, oil and money!Gordon Brown and Lord Mandelson visited Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in November 2008. They asked for billions to be put into the International Monetary Fund and, as Mandelson later admitted, offered Saudis some influence over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind the Islamisation of the West as their Wahhabi form of Islam is making Islam dominant in the world by spreading Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions to promote holy war and convert thousands of British Muslims.Barclays Bank has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking and Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance. Sharia is a project for Islamicising society. Alistair Darling, Chancellor of the Exchequer, advocates Sharia finance.Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed that eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have received over £233.5 million from Saudi sources since 1995.The EU uses social engineering techniques they studied in Russia in 2005 when the Audio Visual Observatory of the European Council held a symposium in Moscow.
Benita Ferrero Waldner, European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy, in her speech entitled “Intercultural dialogue: the media’s role”, told selected media representatives from across Europe: “Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviours by individuals. By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.
“In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies. I am convinced that will have a significant impact… We will identify a nucleus of journalists and analysts around which to develop a structured, sustainable system of information exchange and publication focused on North–South understanding.”
She said, “Europeans know from bitter experience the gravity of the threat racism and xenophobia represent. Indeed, the European Union was born out of the cataclysm of intolerance that engulfed twentieth-century Europe. Our task has been … minimising hatred and maximising reason. And today the European Union stands as a testimony to Europe’s religious, linguistic and cultural diversity. We are a community of values, united by our diversity and our determination to prevent such a threat from overwhelming us again.“That is not to deny there are problems in Europe. Racism and xenophobia stem from fear of the unknown, of the different, and in uncertain times they are never far from the surface. That is why we have set up the Monitoring Centre and why we are continually fighting for equality and tolerance.”
Waldner and her kind are using the last war to justify surrendering Europe to Islam.
People using politically correct “isms”, devised by those who seek to destroy us, show they do not think for themselves and have been programmed by the media. They talk like robots using the totalitarian words: “racism”, “fascist”, “hate speech”, now “Islamophobia” — which are meant to stop people thinking about what is happening in a rational way.The destruction of Western Europe is taking place through mass immigration and the imposition of totalitarian laws and bureaucratic Human Rights Commissions to oppress dissident patriots. Only a small minority of the Muslim community is involved in street fighting, but the entire community wishes to see Islamic ways dominate the capital cities of Europe.
The World Culture Forum Alliance, founded by the Ford Foundation, is linked to the US Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA, as well as the EU, the European Council and UNESCO. They have admitted they are using propaganda and withholding certain news to manage and control us.The Anna Lindh Foundation was founded by the Arab League, the EU, the European Council and UNESCO. Traugott Schoefthaler, head of the Anna Lindh Foundation, said: “We will arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals — like the ‘Images of the Middle East’, which lasted six weeks in 2006 in Denmark.
“We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism’ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination — and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypic images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media and advertising.“And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (Muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.“And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.”
In 1995, EU leaders made a contract, known as the Barcelona Agreement, with the leaders of the countries surrounding the Mediterranean. Its purpose is to ensure mass immigration from North Africa into the EU that will destroy our civilisations in Western Europe. This has been kept from the people even though it will become effective in 2010. Some excerpts will show what we are not being told.The EU intends to force its subject peoples to respect Islam which means persecuting any who oppose EU sponsored invasion. We are to obey the dictates of multiculturalism to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in Europe. This targets Europeans, while other groups are allowed their own separate development. There is to be a one-sided campaign against ‘racism’, ‘xenophobia’ and ‘intolerance’. It is meant to be applicable to whites but not other ethnic groups.
There is to be more Muslim influence on radio, television, newspapers and magazines. A youth exchange programme is to bring about cooperation between future Euro-Mediterranean generations as stipulated in the Barcelona Declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference.Our respective European religions and cultures are devalued ready for the implementation of Islamic mores. The populations of the nine Muslim countries will be given free movement of goods, services, capital and people into Europe in return for political and economic changes. Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria (Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Minister Conference in Naples held on 2–3.12.2003). Negotiations for Turkish EU entrance began in 2005.Less than a month after 9/11 the EU rulers again surrendered to Islam: “The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasised by everybody as a suitable and recognised instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilisations. The ministers agreed to work on deepening the ongoing dialogue between the cultures and civilisations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media.”
Also read the speech by the head of the “Danish Centre for Culture and Development” (CKD) — run by the Danish Foreign Ministry — Olaf Gerlach Hansen, in Rabat, Morocco, 13 June 2005.
The European Union and the European Council plan to destroy our identity: “Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between ‘them’ and ‘us’, even mentioning ‘the other’ , as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual.”
Yet they impose the collective identity “European” on all the diverse nations of Europe! It is a change to a new collective that they plan.The EU have made cooperation agreements with the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which aims — according to article 5a of its charter — to spread Muslim ways of thinking and living in the entire world (Charter of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization — ISESCO).Our politicians cannot face the reality of widespread war with Islam throughout Europe so they pretend we have shared goals. Margaret Beckett, when Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on the 7July 2006: “Our obligation to the values that mean most to us — freedom, tolerance and justice — has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.”
The UN is no longer what it was set up to be. The Durban conference of 2005 lifted the veil on reality. The Conference against Racism was meant to pillory whites for crimes of slavery and colonialism but became a fest of anti- Jewishness from Muslim countries.Kofi Annan, UN secretary general, showed his hatred of whites: “The pain and anger are still felt. The dead, through their descendants, cry out for justice.” The delegates at the conference from the Arab–Muslim states ignored their own involvement in slavery and united with the African group in demanding anti-colonialist revenge: “The West, which is genocidal by nature, should recognise its crimes, beg for forgiveness and pay symbolic and financial reparations to the victims of its oppression.” This is effectively a declaration of war against white and Jewish communities!Zionism was portrayed as the new Nazism and apartheid was “white viciousness”, which they claimed had caused “one Holocaust after the other in Africa” through human trafficking, slavery and colonialism. According to them, Israel should disappear and its politicians tried at an international tribunal like Nuremberg. There were anti-Semitic cartoons circulated, copies of Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as evidence. Beneath a photo of Hitler was a lament that had he lived, Israel wouldn’t have existed and the Palestinians would not have been harmed. Several delegates were threatened; there were shouts of “Death to Jews.” Sudanese Minister of Justice, Ali Mohamed Osman Yasin, demanded reparations for historical slavery, although in his own country, people are being used as slaves as I write. This is what the EU is importing into Europe and our MEPs are trying to combat these evils.

Multiculturalism for numbnuts

Checking my vault of knowledge of ancient history, I find some note appertaining to a young fella who went by the name Alexander.

You may have heard of him as he's known to a lot of people having conquered most of Persia and India?

Well anyway, if memory serves me right he ordered his lads to marry Persians which according to more acceptable historians ( the marxist leftie one who got us in this mess ), he was a Great leader and that's why they refer to him as Alexander the Great see.

Only I seem to remember he died quite ( very ) young. 33 I think it was or maybe 32 was it. But anyway, his empire was lost and he was dead and all his 'happy' troops who the historians told us were happy to carry out his orders when he was alive, apparently fckued off back home rather quick shortly after he was poisoned....er died unexpectantly for no reason I mean.

Anyway, there was another empire that people may have heard of which emanated from a place in Italy called Rome. It too believed in a multi-cultural policy and even brought former slave kings into politics. I seem to have lost my records for that little episode but I do know that the empire failed miserably toward the end when again no one could make their mind up and millions of people ran "back home".

Then there was another colonialist power which I seem to remember being ran by one Victoria, Empress and Queen of everywhere the sun didn't set, and that fell into a rather bad demise too ( apparently ) for some strange reason although I'm sure trying to manage a billion odd people of half a dozen different cultures was to blame for that as some blame the Americans. Who incidentally have their own multicultural problems.

Now we have the European Numnut Union with a load of stupid people in it thinking it's good to be "unified in diversity" or some strange crap, which to any sane person means "things made to go together intentionally which do not fit". i.e. They are different and will never fit together no matter how much time you take to do it because they are different see. Like trying to place two opposite poles of two magnets together they are.

Individuals of course can assimilate with one another because love conquers all does it not? i.e. Two magnets that use the correct polarity can easily attract one another.

But the moment you attempt to force two opposites together you really come unstuck a bit. Like Alexander, like the Romans and like Victoria who just managed to save herself but left the door open to her kingdom!!!

That's my take on it anyroad.
Square pegs in round holes hasn't got a look in with these fellas.

And that's why policies which force whole nations of different cultures to mix will never work in my opinion.

Is this the end of Unipolarism?

The U.S. dollar may be dealt a major blow to its dominant role in global trade...
A report in the 'Independent' newspaper in the UK, says that Gulf states along with China, Russia, Japan and France are planning to stop using the greenback in oil deals.



The demise of the dollar

In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading

By Robert Fisk

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning – along with China, Russia, Japan and France – to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years.

More