Are They on Drugs or What!

Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax!

It's the dream of many not to pay it, the dream of many who hope they'll get away with not paying it, the dream of many who think there's an unlimited bucket of taxpayers cash to meet the needs of their ideologies, and the dream of many more others who wish the wasters would just get lost, if they actually did!

What is it about Peter Carter, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, that he  forces himself to make speeches to say that 'he' thinks it would be a good idea if we taxpayers funded drug taking for heroine addicts?

Of course there will no doubt be an awful lot of people who will argue that the drug taker is not the  root of the cause of their addiction but rather that this is down to the pusher and I'd agree with them. But not only does it defy all logic to dip into the taxpayers bucket without asking, it also makes no sense or logic for the government to actually fail to tackle the cause of the bigger crime of pushing drugs.

"Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" - remember who said that?

Oh, that's a coincidence, I just happened to have the 1997 Labour Party Manifesto on my screen when I said that, and it says those precise words.

But hang on, Tony Blair was Prime Minister then and he promised buckets full of taxpayers cash to sort the drug problem out before he 'snuk' out of office with his Poodle tail between his legs. However, I recall Stalin's earthly manifestation, Gordon Brown, saying something distinctly similar if not inconsequentially indifferent!

Yes, indeed, Brown has repeated these aims, repeated the spending of our money, now the bucket is empty, but we have another tax giveaway preacher on the stage telling us we now have to pay for Brown and Blair's incompetence to sort the drug problems out.

I'd like to know:

Why when we know the sources of illegal heroine (Afghanistan), are we permitting a)  Drugs out of that place. b) Seeing a rise in drug taking in Britain (and no doubt America). c) Not making laws to hang drug pushers. d) Not holding an investigation into where the drugs are going to when they leave Afghanistan,who gives the orders, who's driving it, and what the price is to the taxpayers of a war there along with the criminal and justice systems here, as well as the cost to the taxpayers for existing medical treatments and therapies, when we appear to take care of these criminal drug addicts rather than jail them, when the cause of their own demise is the fact that they just don't seem to want to say NO?

Surely drug pushers wouldn't have a market if people said no more often and the pusher were subject to death by hanging for the crime they commit against an entire society when they make their millions from the deaths and high taxes of others!

Maybe the next government will also know where I am coming from too then before they contemplate spending tax payers money on an illegal substance, and more taxpayers money on an illegal war, whilst attempting to convince us they are doing their best to cure the ailing economy which makes those criminals in government make tax rises to pay for heroine without asking us.

This is death by Taxes and I have to wonder whether it is THEM on drugs!