A Web of Global Deceit

The Web, or internet, may be the last bastion of truth as well as the best form of delivering that truth.

So much so, that we are able to hop, skip and jump from continent to continent and back again in an instant, and in terms of it providing public information there is nothing better.

We people already know that there are restrictions to what the media and to what politicians can tell us of course, as the media for instance has essentially to follow rules, copyright, regulation of its content, bias of the presenter, journalist or editor and even of the camera guy, and thus our news is condensed to bring us messages only of what 'the media' deems suitable for us to see and hear.

The web on the other hand is like an unlimited number of loose cannons in one sense, so it is pretty obvious where MSM is heading unless it begins to remedy the problem its self imposed rules have created, which in a lot of cases makes large audiences simply reach for the off button or skip to another page when they see 'news' carrying little more than one-sided argument which has been subjected to the biases I described above.

I think it is unlikely to be the case that the media will change and I find it difficult to imagine how it can change, given the constraints it has of time, and also given the ramifications it would begin to have if the media suddenly started to 'tell it like it really is'.

We can all cite many instances of bias, and we can all cite many instances where stories are simply not covered, and this must surely play on the minds of many people when they consider if they are actually being given information by the media which is objective or truthful, and whether they are being given all of it.

An example of this could for instance be when mass protests were occurring over the Lisbon Treaty, the BBC and other media were busily showing another famine or drought in some far off place that has nothing to do with us. - Surely we have all noticed that?

Another example could be the constant playing of stories of BNP members being 'thugs' and 'fascists', when in fact they've covered nothing other than the latest UAF protest, and omitted to say that no members of the BNP were actually there. i.e. Knowing as we do that street protest is against our policy, and that anyone engaged in this would be expelled, then it is ourselves who rightly get angry when we hear stories which incite the country to hatred against the BNP.

For how on earth could the media deliberately not transmit the fact that the BNP wasn't there when UAF were protesting against other groups?

So we know the media is purposely aimed against us, and we know that government, union and politically sponsored groups like UAF, Socialist Workers Party, Hope Not Hate, Searchlight, Nothing British et al, are being deliberately arraigned against us in defiance of the law itself (for people not to be subjected to discrimination), and we know that governments should not have MI5 and Special Branch officers, undercover in anti-fascist organizations fighting policemen and causing street violence whilst creating havoc in the public's eye that the cause of this havoc is a political party which had nothing to do with any of it.

In this sense we know it is wrong but what can we do to correct it without an unbiased media?

I think the internet is the only way to get truth out, and I think it could well be the only thing standing between people, government and revolution. As I say, it is the last bastion of truth.

So what's this guy all about?

Billionaire - Lakshmi Mittal

Well Mr Mittal happens to be described as a British - Asian, a billionaire steel maker and a director of Goldman Sachs. He's on the Sunday Times rich list and could well now be the wealthiest man in Europe bar the Rothchild's.

I read this in the Sunday Times about him along with another 1,000 of the 'top rich', having made so much money during a period of recession at a time when ordinary people are losing their homes and jobs, and I wondered (as you do), whether he could in anyway be responsible for their demise.

This is where the internet comes in handy because you are unlikely to make the links yourselves by reading 'news' papers.

Mr Mittal began the first steel production based on scrap metal. i.e. Lower quality sold cheap, just as any other product we see these days.

Think inferior quality, cheap price, and Mr Mittal, and you're half way there to beginning to understand why our steel industries collapsed.

Think Richard Branson, inferior quality, cheap price, and you'll see why British Airways struggle to make a living and are on the verge of bankruptcy.

Think about Goldman Sachs and the rich list.

Think about an FSA investigation over Goldman Sachs misleading the markets.

Think of Mr Mittal's £2 million pound donation to the Labour Party, and through Tony Blair, and then think of Richard Branson flying our flag on his beach in the Virgin Islands.

Think of the Labour Party, a party formed for the working man, 'donating' our money to the bankers (some of whom are with Richard Branson in the Virgin Isles), in order to compensate the 'losses' of companies such as Goldman Sachs where Mr Mittal is a director, and then think of the 50,000 old aged pensioners who died of cold last year, the 3 million unemployed, the steel works which have closed, and the Labour Party, the Liberal Party, and the Conservative Party, along with the media, UAF, Searchlight, Hope Not Hate, the Socialist Workers Party, MI5, Special Branch, and the Fabian Society, along with Mr Mittal's global 'Kellogg school of management' with its Asian business schools and economic development there instead of here, and then think of the £9billion in AID our government and the other parties give to others whilst they rake up debt and taxes for us, and then ask yourself WHY the British public are not made aware of any of it?

Mittal purchased an Irish Steel plant in Cork from the government for a nominal fee of £1 and three years later in 2001, it was closed leaving 400 people redundant.

Now think of Corus steel plant on Teesside and Peter Mandelson, and ask yourselves who he serves, and whether you think it is the British people.

When you're done asking yourselves that question, you could also ponder on the question how an Indian businessman can be 'British', when the British 'don't exist', and you can also ask yourselves how the Labour Party, Conservatives and LibDems can all be saying they are British, when they have all supported a firm (with our money), that is being investigated for misleading the public whilst 'we British' are

a) Being swamped with migrant workers,

b) Are being eradicated in our own country and made poverty stricken into the bargain, and why people like you are worthless, whilst people like Mittal are given awards such as 'Globalist of the Year', despite that employees of Mittal have accused him of "slave labour" conditions after multiple fatalities in his mines after twenty-three miners died in explosions in his mines in Kazakhstan caused by faulty - cheap - inferior quality - gas detectors.

You might also recall that Mittal was the guy who wanted a steel plant in Romania with the promise of jobs, and who paid Tony Blair to help him sell the idea through - The Media.