Not one word more from me about Goyim.

When we leave the house we 'go out'. But we have to 'go in' somewhere else so when we go out we 'go in' to the 'outside' or else we'd be nowhere and that's impossible.  But if we go  out to the 'INN',  then we'd be out and in at the inn both at the same time, and that's how confusing words can be sometimes because you can't be out and in at the same time because that's impossible.

Confused? Well it's intentional. Because just as we give meanings to words, we must realise that others give their own meanings sometimes to the same sounding words and sometimes to the exact same words we ourselves use.

Take a simple word like in (or inn), and an audience of a few people, and already you can see with what I have written here, how easy it would be to confuse them.

Bell - for instance is to me a good word which signifies a sound I like and it makes me think of churches, but if you want to check its origin you will find its root is in the Latin word 'bellum' which is war. You might think as I do, that when churches 'ring their bells', they are ringing them in a good way. You might also think they're a tad noisy on a Sunday morning and you may in fact not like them I don't know as I can only speak for me and how I feel about 'bells'. But if you know the origin of that word then you might appreciate that some people would think church bells are ringing for war.

Another word I could mention is Ba'al, which some say is the word people use for Beelzebub, who to some is one of the seven princes of hell and is Satan or the devil. Notice how bell also sounds like hell here and how if you go too far into exploring innocuous sounding words like bell, you could end up in a lot of bother especially if you'd had too much to drink in the inn one night and decided to shout 'devil worshippers', to a party of Christians who happened to be ringing their innocuous bells at Christmas.

Basically, we can accept the definitions others give to the words they use, or else we place our own, in which case we might be completely wrong I think it fair to say, and that's the purpose of this article. i.e. Not to get too hung up on words which we think make sense to us but forget they may have an entirely different meaning to others.

It was on this note that I recently used the word 'Goyim', which seemingly held a different meaning for one reader than it did for me. Goyim is today an urban word which many use to mean 'cattle' when they speak about mankind and of course it is used pejoratively. I took that word Goyim in the urban context but a reader took it solely as having a Jewish origin because that's what they've decided. They decided not to ask me what I really meant by the word and thus went off on one suggesting I was 'anti-Semitic', and yet anyone who knows me would know this could not be further from the truth. To me, I tend to let live and let live and tend not to want to shape the feelings of others since I really don't much care what beliefs other people want to hold. I guess I'd describe myself pro-truth rather than anti-anything, and Goyim to me at least, still means cattle in my urban dictionary in the same way 'Gay' now means homosexual rather than happy.

But I'm not one to lose a friend with no reason so I looked into this word a bit further.

I found that the word Goyim derives from the word 'Goy', and is used in the First Testament to signify a nation. For instance: In the Torah/Hebrew Bible, goy and its variants appear over 550 times in reference to Israelites and to Gentile nations. The first recorded usage of goy occurs in Genesis 10:5 and applies innocuously to non-Israelite nations. The first mention in relation to the Israelites comes in Genesis 12:2, when God promises Abraham that his descendants will form a goy gadol ("great nation"). While the earlier books of the Hebrew Bible often use goy to describe the Israelites, the later ones tend to apply the term to other nations.

Some Bible translations leave the word Goyim untranslated and treat it as the proper name of a country in Genesis 14:1. Bible commentaries suggest that the term may refer to Gutium. The "King of Goyim" was Tidal.

But the use if the word Goyim (just like any other word we use), is changed over the course of time as in the case of this word and its use today is generally used to mean cattle as opposed to a country or depending on your perspective, 'anti-semitic' or non-Jewishness.

I might say that all of this is quite confusing to me also, and that's why I bothered to research the word as part of my deliberate research into the origin of religion itself.

My own personal disposition generally prevents me from dismissing things I don't fully understand as mumbo-jumbo and that's why in so far as religion is concerned I am Agnostic yet I do believe in Jesus Christ's teachings that they are good. i.e. I do not believe that church bells are ringing for the devil in the same way I do not believe that the World Cup vuvuzela horn is a modern day replacement for a messianic goat horn which is intended to summon up the devil yet I do understand that there are some who would think that given that I watched The Life of Brian and became aware from that moment that there are some people who read the wrong signs and have always done this throughout history as proven by the words I've thus-far mentioned. That is unless YOU feel that the vevuzela is being sold to the Goyim by unscrupulous money men who have made a conspiracy with one another to get the Goyim to summon up Beelzebub at this World Cup series?

Before I go on

I would just like to add that this article is not intended to be an academic resource it is simply a statement of what I believe today. I make no claims other than my own opinion and my right to express it, but I will say that despite I'm 54 years old, I am always ready to learn new words, new symbols, and new opinions providing they are open to my own research because one thing I can say solidly of having learned is that you should never trust a damn thing anyone says or anything you read or see unless YOU can establish yourself that it is true or at least based on a modicum of factual substance which makes the thing you believe to become reasonable.

Symbols then

I say 'then' because one has to remember that meanings change. They change because we are ourselves changing their use and we are not banning the changes. That is why the word gay now denotes what it does instead of denoting happiness and 'gaiety'.

So in my research I looked at the symbol of the star of David and I looked at what it once represented and what it represents today. I found that to many it will signify just that - The Star of David. But remember words (and symbols) have different meanings to different people and that The Star of David has MANY different origins of meaning. i.e. It is not the sole signpost for Israel or for Jews but is used by others to mean different things. Why? Well because symbols are not given by 'God' remember. They are ALL man made and even if you're religious you will understand that Moses told all his followers to get rid of them and to stop worshipping them and that is a commandment that 'Ye Shalt have no other Gods before me'.

Think of the pyramids of Geezer and then think of an inverted pyramid laid on top of the other and you'll have a 'Star' which resembles The Star of David.

What I have just done there is proven to you that the 'Star of David' could NOT be the sole sign of Jewishness because clearly if you know anything at all, you would know that even Rome used it quite innocuously and in wholesale amounts to tart up their 'pavements'. See also, early messianic symbols which bear the Christian 'fish' sign and the pentacle together.

You would also know that Abraham's people (Israelites) were said to be like the 'stars', and you would also know that Ancient Egyptians worshiped 'stars' and the 'sun' and indeed built pyramids which reflected half a star and also pointed toward the 'heavens'. But you would know that ancient Egyptians were not Israelites, nor were they 'Jewish', and nor were they Romans.

So the Star of David is simply a symbol to which certain people put their own interpretation.

When you understand this to be in fact the case, it is quite easy to then understand other things such as the origins of religions. Some will say religion is all mumbo-jumbo, some will say it is destructive, some will say they are good, some will say they are evil and some will have other views such as the followers of those religions would say that the Star of David is 'ours'.

But as I said, this is not an academic study it is just my opinion and I have a right to have it. So I 'wondered' as you do - not about where we came from because that doesn't interest me - No, I wonder about where ideas of men emanate because that's just the way I am. I'm curious, like a child who looks at the heavens and the stars and the sun and 'wonders'. I realise I will always be a child of the universe until I die and that I'm unlikely to know anything at all about where man came from because that's just the way things are. So I accept not knowing and I disbelieve anything I cannot prove but being agnostic I prefer not to invent or theorize about a 'reason' for our existence. I'll leave that up to theocratic clever people who like to demand others follow their belief systems rather than accepting the plain fact that we just don't know.

i.e. I am impervious to psychological brainwashing such as you'll find in most things today where some would turn a simple word like gay which means happy into a word which gives it an entirely different meaning which is contra to being 'happy'.

So I looked into 'Martinism' and I'm still looking

I have to say that I'm still looking into it but one guy seems to know a lot about it because he wrote a book. He called it Shadow Masters and you'll find him on my search under Daniel Estulin. I suggest you researchers listen to his expose of Bilderberg on YouTube too, which after all his research he can be believed as being an expert on that.

Estulin believes (and I tend to believe him), that Martinism is what's behind Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign relations, the Tri-Lateral Commission, the UN, IMF, and other such bodies we might refer to as The New World Order. Heck, there's that phrase again which makes people think 'nut'.

I accept that there are men who have always believed they can shape the world and the 'Goyim' for their own interests, and that this will always be this way. Think about our psyche as a being, or a spirit if you will, and you will see that mankind has and will always strive to be at the top of that 'pyramid'.

Martinism is apparently older than the oldest religion itself.

It encompassed ALL other religions and allows ALL other religions to 'worship' their own prophets as they see fit. Martinism relates to Jesus Christ for example as 'the repairer', and it refers to other prophets who came into being 'after' the 'fall of the first man'. i.e. Way way way before Judaism.

Yet Martinism enshrines all religions and even the mystic religions such as Druidism and of course ancient Egyptian religions which at that time became banned by the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten.

Again, think how mankind has always developed religions which encompass the beliefs of former religions and you will see why the 'Star of David' is in fact no different to the Martinist Pentacle

As I have said, this is not intended to be an academic study but rather my opinion here, but since it is said to be 'a form of mystical and esoteric Christianity concerned with the fall of the first man, his state of material privation from his divine source, and the process of his return, called 'Reintegration' or illumination. I can't help but make an assimilation between its root to seek the 'return', 'integration' and 'illumination',  of the 'return of the first fallen man, to the belief of the 'return' of Satan through the Order of the Illuminati in order to 'illuminate' the earth for those who believe and worship the ancient Order. In this case of course, Goyim would be the displacement  or death of 'The King on Earth', whoever that might be.

If you believe the Goyim is king then you will believe the King on earth is the collective 'us' and that we are all to perish because we are not of the Order we are the 'Goyim' who 'inherited the earth'.

I'm still researching it of course and I'm open to information on it, but at this stage I can presume I have enough knowledge to make the assertion that given we have secret organisations making decisions for the rest of us, and given that we are in truth excluded from them because we are considered the underclass, or Goyim, and given that all religions are indeed accepted within this cult, society, order, call it what you will, that none of it's works can be ascribed to any one doctrine other than the original doctrines of ancient Egypt which again, clearly found their beliefs had been made void and made to go underground by Akhenaten.

My only question at this point is a rhetorical one which I ask that you ask yourself if reading this.

Would you renounce deeply held beliefs about the origin of man, along with all of your knowledge of how to achieve a higher position over others (the non-believers or Goyim), if your beliefs were simply banned. Or would you continue to practice those beliefs in secret if you knew that the 'Goyim' (the King on Earth) would destroy you if he knew where you were? My answer is NO, I would never throw away or stop believing because my beliefs were banned, I would simply practice them in secret. Assuming I had some that is.

And I am deliberately making reference to The King on Earth here as possibly also being Solomon, but it could just as well be our Lord and divine heavenly father Jesus. For if 'the meek shall inherit the earth' then we Goyim already own it unless of course there is really an Armageddon about to befall us which sees the return of Satan and his reintegration for those who are 'illuminated' by the ancient order of St Martin or if you prefer, the Illuminati, at which time we Goyim will all end up dead in the battle between good and evil.

According to some premillennial Christian interpretations, the Messiah, the "Lamb", Jesus Christ, will return to earth and defeat the Antichrist (the "beast") in the battle of Armageddon. Then Satan will be put into the bottomless pit or abyss for 1,000 years, known as the Millennial age. After being released from the abyss, Satan will gather Gog and Magog from the four corners of the earth. They will encamp surrounding the holy ones and the "beloved city". Fire will come down from God, out of heaven and devour Gog and Magog after the Millenium, and the Devil who deceived them is thrown into Gehenna (the lake of fire and brimstone) where the Beast and the False Prophet have been since just before the 1,000 years. Wiki

Not one word more from me about Goyim.