Demographic Winter is a dramatic documentary about declining birth rates which describes how world population is growing not as a result of higher birth rates, but rather as a result of increasing health provision coupled with immigration in the west, whilst other populations are falling and our own cultural base is disappearing ever more rapidly as a result. (see full version at the bottom of this article)
It opens a lot of controversial issues regarding the decline of western populations, and explains why immigration has been adopted by governments simply to replace the declining family unit in the west.
Philip Longman, a demographer and author of “The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity,” observes: “The on-going global decline in human birthrates is the single most powerful force affecting the fate of nations and the future of society in the 21st. century.”
Yet we are told the world is becoming 'overpopulated', which is clearly untrue for there would be no need to import people to feed the economy if birth rates were rising.
The fact is, that since the family unit has changed, where women became 'liberated' to work instead of being a people production unit (mother), then all across the world, birth rates have been falling.
The science is clear when you consider how human numbers produced by each family in each society must be maintained at a certain level in order to flourish, that if numbers are lower than the minimum, population will also fall over time to a point where it becomes irreversible.
Population is the engine of growth in any economy, and thus as birth rates decline, it becomes an economic imperative to replace that population.
The issues raised by this are many, and it fully explains why societies are at odds with their politicians who have never sought to explain this to us or to reasonably provide any answers to the questions posed by declining birth rates and the essential result of seeing a declining cultural base due to mass immigration for economic reasons.
Why do politicians not tell the people that taking young males from other countries in order to replace our own, will in essence prevent the economic growth of the country from where they take them, whilst failing also to prevent the eventual eradication of their own people by means of replacement.
It's easy to say 'Well we're all the same and we are one humanity on the earth so what does it matter'. But that's not an answer to the reason why humanity in parts of the world have no ability to make their own economies which could provide better health and education along with peace from political disruption, if the west had not taken their populations to replace their own.
Economic wealth can only be maintained with rising populations, and our family units can only be maintained (as can others), by enabling them to grow by promoting motherhood.
Our nations, cultures and 'races', can only be maintained by stopping mass immigration which is really in essence, stealing people from the third world to replace our own, and unless this is stopped then it will continue to result in the decline of total world population, along with perpetual poverty in the third world. The disappearance of populations in western civilizations will have been caused by the decisions of politicians who for economic reasons chose to destroy their own peoples in what amounts to genocide over a few generations.
Human Events
'Demographic Winter' Exposes the Century's Overlooked Crisis
What the world faces in the 21st century is another type of demographic crisis, but one that is painfully real: falling fertility rates and aging populations which could ultimately endanger civilization.
The average woman has to have 2.1 children during her lifetime just to replace current population.
In less than 40 years, fertility rates have fallen by over 50% worldwide. In 1970, the average woman had 6 children during her lifetime. Today, the global average is 2.9. The United Nations Population Division predicts a further decline to 2.05 by 2050.
In much of the industrialized world, the crisis can be discerned even now:• Europe might as well hang a “Going Out of Business” sign on its door. The average birth rate for the European Union is 1.5, well below replacement (2.1). In Italy, it’s 1.2.
• Russia has a birth rate of 1.17, down from 2.4 in 1990. There are now almost as many abortions as births in the Russian Federation. The nation is losing roughly 750,000 people a year. Its current population (143 million) is expected to decline to 112 million by 2050. In a desperate effort to stave off demographic winter, the government is offering a baby bonus of 250,000 rubles (the equivalent of $9,200) for every child a family has after the first.
• Worldwide, there are 6 million fewer children (6 years of age and younger) today than there were in 1990. This is an initial tremor of a coming earthquake. If current trends continue, by 2050, the world will hold 248 million fewer children under 5 than it does today.
• The industrialized world will soon face severe labor shortages. The European Union estimates a shortfall of 20 million workers by 2030.
• In the developed world, populations are rapidly aging. In 1989, 11.6% of Japan’s population was over 65. Less than 20 years later, seniors are 21.1% of the Japanese people. Its low birthrate (1.25) and graying population are why almost no one talks about Japan Inc. anymore. In the 1990s, Japan’s stock market fell 80% from its all-time high and its real estate market lost 60% of its value.
• In industrialized nations as a whole, those over 60 now constitute 20% of the population -- a figure which will rise to 32% by 2050. By then, according to UNPD, these societies will have two seniors for every child.
• The developing world isn’t far behind. In the Philippines, the birth rate dropped from 6 in the early 1970s to 2.8 today, with further declines in store. In Egypt, in the 1960s, the average woman had 7.3 children during her lifetime, compared to 3.7 today. Mexico’s birthrate is only 2.1, the same as America’s.
This “Demographic Winter” will impact on many areas of our lives:
• How will Russia, which is expected to lose a third of its population by mid-point of this century, defend its borders? If Russia, which occupies the largest territory of any nation, dissolves into enclaves of squabbling ethnic groups it will destabilize both Europe and Asia.
• Due to falling birthrates, at some point in the century, the world’s population will begin to decline. Then the decline will become rapid. We could even reach population free-fall.
• Throughout the course of history, there is no instance of economic growth accompanied by population decline. How can an industrial society be maintained with fewer and fewer workers and consumers?
Yet we are told the world is becoming 'overpopulated', which is clearly untrue for there would be no need to import people to feed the economy if birth rates were rising.
The fact is, that since the family unit has changed, where women became 'liberated' to work instead of being a people production unit (mother), then all across the world, birth rates have been falling.
The science is clear when you consider how human numbers produced by each family in each society must be maintained at a certain level in order to flourish, that if numbers are lower than the minimum, population will also fall over time to a point where it becomes irreversible.
Population is the engine of growth in any economy, and thus as birth rates decline, it becomes an economic imperative to replace that population.
The issues raised by this are many, and it fully explains why societies are at odds with their politicians who have never sought to explain this to us or to reasonably provide any answers to the questions posed by declining birth rates and the essential result of seeing a declining cultural base due to mass immigration for economic reasons.
Why do politicians not tell the people that taking young males from other countries in order to replace our own, will in essence prevent the economic growth of the country from where they take them, whilst failing also to prevent the eventual eradication of their own people by means of replacement.
It's easy to say 'Well we're all the same and we are one humanity on the earth so what does it matter'. But that's not an answer to the reason why humanity in parts of the world have no ability to make their own economies which could provide better health and education along with peace from political disruption, if the west had not taken their populations to replace their own.
Economic wealth can only be maintained with rising populations, and our family units can only be maintained (as can others), by enabling them to grow by promoting motherhood.
Our nations, cultures and 'races', can only be maintained by stopping mass immigration which is really in essence, stealing people from the third world to replace our own, and unless this is stopped then it will continue to result in the decline of total world population, along with perpetual poverty in the third world. The disappearance of populations in western civilizations will have been caused by the decisions of politicians who for economic reasons chose to destroy their own peoples in what amounts to genocide over a few generations.
Human Events
'Demographic Winter' Exposes the Century's Overlooked Crisis
What the world faces in the 21st century is another type of demographic crisis, but one that is painfully real: falling fertility rates and aging populations which could ultimately endanger civilization.
The average woman has to have 2.1 children during her lifetime just to replace current population.
In less than 40 years, fertility rates have fallen by over 50% worldwide. In 1970, the average woman had 6 children during her lifetime. Today, the global average is 2.9. The United Nations Population Division predicts a further decline to 2.05 by 2050.
In much of the industrialized world, the crisis can be discerned even now:• Europe might as well hang a “Going Out of Business” sign on its door. The average birth rate for the European Union is 1.5, well below replacement (2.1). In Italy, it’s 1.2.
• Russia has a birth rate of 1.17, down from 2.4 in 1990. There are now almost as many abortions as births in the Russian Federation. The nation is losing roughly 750,000 people a year. Its current population (143 million) is expected to decline to 112 million by 2050. In a desperate effort to stave off demographic winter, the government is offering a baby bonus of 250,000 rubles (the equivalent of $9,200) for every child a family has after the first.
• Worldwide, there are 6 million fewer children (6 years of age and younger) today than there were in 1990. This is an initial tremor of a coming earthquake. If current trends continue, by 2050, the world will hold 248 million fewer children under 5 than it does today.
• The industrialized world will soon face severe labor shortages. The European Union estimates a shortfall of 20 million workers by 2030.
• In the developed world, populations are rapidly aging. In 1989, 11.6% of Japan’s population was over 65. Less than 20 years later, seniors are 21.1% of the Japanese people. Its low birthrate (1.25) and graying population are why almost no one talks about Japan Inc. anymore. In the 1990s, Japan’s stock market fell 80% from its all-time high and its real estate market lost 60% of its value.
• In industrialized nations as a whole, those over 60 now constitute 20% of the population -- a figure which will rise to 32% by 2050. By then, according to UNPD, these societies will have two seniors for every child.
• The developing world isn’t far behind. In the Philippines, the birth rate dropped from 6 in the early 1970s to 2.8 today, with further declines in store. In Egypt, in the 1960s, the average woman had 7.3 children during her lifetime, compared to 3.7 today. Mexico’s birthrate is only 2.1, the same as America’s.
This “Demographic Winter” will impact on many areas of our lives:
• What will happen in the First World as fewer and fewer workers are called on to provide pensions for more and more retirees? At what point will the burden become so onerous that young workers will simply rebel and refuse to support a system that they couldn’t possibly hope to benefit from?
• How will Russia, which is expected to lose a third of its population by mid-point of this century, defend its borders? If Russia, which occupies the largest territory of any nation, dissolves into enclaves of squabbling ethnic groups it will destabilize both Europe and Asia.
• Due to falling birthrates, at some point in the century, the world’s population will begin to decline. Then the decline will become rapid. We could even reach population free-fall.
• Throughout the course of history, there is no instance of economic growth accompanied by population decline. How can an industrial society be maintained with fewer and fewer workers and consumers?
Link: 
(full version)
(full version)
The obsession of the politicians with economic and population growth is due to the banksters viewpoint that these debtors (which we call nations), have to underwrite their ever growing debts that way. As we have recently witnessed, banksters rig what are supposed to be free markets, and end up owning everything (even government pension funds).
ReplyDeleteAdd to that the establishment's imperial viewpoint of the world - stay in power through economic divide and conquer: regions like Africa have been designated for looting, and those resources including people.
In short: imperialism & slavery have never gone away, we've been repeating history since the days of the Venetian bankers. We can't move on until we put the money-changers back in their place and get politicians in who aren't puppets on a string.
Well said wimwauters and I couldn't agree with you more.
ReplyDelete