ENEMY AT THE GATES

IT' NOT OUR FAULT

BNP TRUTH

I Got a Friend in Obama

Excerpt from The Freedom Movie

Freedom Movie Part Two

Build your own custom video playlist at embedr.com

Freedom Movie Part One

Build your own custom video playlist at embedr.com

National Strikes in Greece

Greece's national strike has turned violent with demonstrators running pitched battles with the police in central Athens. Sky's Europe correspondent Alex Rossi reports.

Now Just a Cotton Picking Minute

Someone is taking the piss and I don't like it. 

It's okay, it's not you, it's them. You probably think I've gone a bit paranoid but I assure you that my psychiatrist says I'm okay so it's not that. It's this thing in my head. This idea. This 'wondering' for want of a better word, tells me something is really wrong with our country and yet despite it's obvious and the government sits on its arse, I know there are people who can fix it.

Someone said to me only yesterday, that in order to tackle a problem you must first learn to recognise it. Pretty simple and good advice I thought. Only the "problem" is everything. Firstly, I should begin by telling you that I was once part of the problem. Too busy you see, and I trusted my government to get on and do what was best because I thought governments were supposed to govern. Let me say, I say I was once a part of the problem but like most other people, whilst I recognise we're all to blame for 'some things', I can't see it is our fault for having governments which form a secret conspiracy against you to rid a people of their own country.

Or did I miss that much at school, when I came out naively believing that governments were supposed to represent those who elected them and that in England at least, we had the finest. 

Regrettably, I must concede this was a fallacy and bow to those superior beings who knew all along that politicians were just a bunch of self-serving lying scumbags who's only merit in life is that they'd not likely break a rope if they fell through the hangman's trapdoor.

I guess it started when I left school. I thought then that I hadn't really bothered much at school but didn't realise until much later, that many of my friends had apparently not bothered as much as me. It took me until a school reunion 20 years later to realise what a load of dummies I went to school with and how smart I was by comparison at least until I realised I'd been buying most the drinks all evening.

Heck, even the teachers were stupid, and yet when I was at school I thought they were intelligent. 

I was wrong, apart I guess from the few who didn't turn up that night back in the mid nineties, probably because they were either too busy or too smart to buy free drinks all night for the not so socially dumb teachers and other reprobates I went to school with,  but generally as an adult I now found them, well, 'just like me'. 

They were still hauling their arses to the same pit of doom most people do when setting out in life. Still building homes and families, saving what they could, and still searching for the ultimate goal, a happy life.

After some 30 odd years of struggle up that same ladder, I can now say I did actually 'make it' because I AM tremendously happy so what's the problem?

Well I've always had this massive sense of fairness I guess, and I've always as long as I can remember, had an automatic revulsion of injustice. 

Some might call it a psychological problem to be bothered about other people this much, or they may even think I'm a socialist. But it can't be that because I believe in capitalism. I recognise however that capitalism in its present form is the actual problem. 

It's this 'type' of capitalism we have which is the problem, not ALL capitalism yet we all generalise with our opinions when we think of ourselves as capitalists or socialists, and this is what I mean when I say we're all guilty.

My question, is why can we not have a different kind of capitalism which has a social conscience and teach people, business owners and governments to actually 'care' about society?

What? You think they do already?

You see if the model of success in any society is that the system provides for the natural desire of some to compete, for some to excel in science and medicine or the arts, for instance, and for those with degrees of less or more ambition so that everyone can find something suitable. That it caters for those who are for whatever reason just unable to make it, whilst not discriminating against the old or infirm, then surely we have the seeds of a society which caters for those who want to get rich and also for those who see life doesn't really mean much if all you dream about is being rich. Lots of people for instance would be just as happy playing a game of darts at the local with their mates after a hard days work than to be stuck on a yacht in the Bahama's with a Gin & Tonic looking like Billy No Mates all except for the presence of a bodyguard and spouse who together might look a picture of happiness but are splitting up next week because they're bored.

Gerald Celente says; "Those countries which have indulged in mass immigration and cheap labour, are going to have to pull up the welcome mat because there's too many people and not enough jobs". He says; "Countries can't just keep printing money", and he predicts another meltdown because they've been "covering it up by printing money" and pretty soon that worthless paper will be "even more worthless". 

He says; unless countries start shipping back the migrants, there's going to be mass civil unrest and even war. He predicts it could lead to WWIII as countries begin to realise they are totally bankrupt, unable to meet their loans, have nothing but worthless paper to fall back on and with no productive base to create an economy. That sounds a whole lot like Britain and now I'm looking for who got us into this mess and find I'm searching in the directory under lying politicians to find BLAIR and BROWN! The two most reckless, disgusting and self aggrandizing politicians in British history. That's who!


I look at the situation now of our society following the recent now nearly 3 year old financial collapse, and I see a great injustice has been done. The bankers and the rich who 'made it' lost their fortunes, yet we underdogs along with our families and our future generations, will be paying forever and a life time through higher taxes, simply so the couple with the Gin & Tonic can continue their own rich lifestyles. 

I won't ask you if you think that's wrong because I can add two and two together and I know the answer myself thank you and it stinks!

So having this sense of injustice, I wondered why governments all across the globe gave away my money to people who are better off than me, and it dawned on me, like I say, that this is not the first time. It further dawned on me, that not only is this bailout, not the first time, but 'economic slavery' is not the first time either.

In my lifetime I can remember a time for instance when mass immigration didn't occur.

I was brought up to believe that multiculturalism and immigration were simply 'inevitable' consequences which had always happened, but now I know that is not true. 'Someone' had to decide to make a policy which encouraged masses of people to travel around the globe, plonking themselves down in other peoples countries, claiming other people's nationalities,  their jobs, and all the benefits that country has to offer, which the indigenous people had worked and paid for, whilst being allowed to claim the 'right' to tell us what to do in our own damn country, regardless of our feelings, regardless our ways and customs, our regardless of our cultures or even whether even bother their backsides that we might feel we have a right to stop them.

It's like a burglar knocking on your door and telling you he's come to burgle your home would you mind stepping aside please. REALLY, that is exactly as it is here in Britain!

Yesterday, I listened to an interesting discussion on BBC Radio 4 with NuLabour MP Frank Field (Sorry Frank but you did sign up to NuLabour after all). He was talking about immigration which I'll go into in a second. Then having heard Frank's discussion, I flicked to Mail Online, and once I'd finished ogling the birds on the right sidebar, I came across an article by columnist Melanie Philips, entitled "At last we know the truth: Labour despises anyone who loves Britain, its values and its history".

I thought WOW! Someone who thinks like me!

Back to Frank Field then. The BBC interviewed a potato farmer/factory boss, who said British people don't apply for jobs so he has to employ immigrants. He was asked what would happen if there were no immigrants and he said "it would lead to higher wages and less ability for him to modernise his plant machinery". 

I must say it was at this point I wondered how a potato-bagging machine can be modernised, and why our country needs mass immigration so he can afford a new potato machine, so that HE gets a higher asset value on his business account and continues to get richer whilst British people have not had 'work' or income because he's employed load of cheap Ukrainians to bag his spuds instead of the indigenous people, because they of course would require more income since they would not be squashed 11 to a room with 10 other immigrants.

Frank Field says; "Our schools are producing people who are unemployable", and I can tell him why but I'm not on Channel 4 radio.

Do you see the problem?

We are 'making people' without any care to 'make them jobs', whilst the farmer and other business people get richer on the back of cheap immigrant labour whilst our country is being tipped down the toilet by a government and an opposition that doesn't care to change the system. Instead, they applaud it, and would prefer to keep it because they are not the one's who's families are being wrecked by unemployment.

I questioned myself as to where this farmers workforce lived, and who met the cost of their children's schools, homes, health needs and other services and figured since we have a National debt of close to £1Trillion, that these things were being met by taxpayers who and by government borrowing.

Needless to say, if you listen to the discussion, you will hear Frank Field question whether "the money markets will continue to loan us money", and you might begin to feel as I do, that the money markets are the banks we taxpayers gave money to because they were gone out of business.

You may wonder at this point - why, and you may wonder who benefited and if you're really smart you will know it isn't you because all you have to do is to look in your empty pocket, look at the waiting list at the doctors, or look at your children when they tell you they were given a cultural diversity lesson today and they had to kneel on the floor to worship Allah.

When you see the size of the 'mountain of debt' which Frank Field refers to, then you see that the government is simply borrowing money to meet the cost of putting our own people out of work, whilst it is also accepting, without any reference to ourselves, millions of extra people here who are adding to the need to 'produce more potatoes'. GET IT YET?

More people = More everything including potatoes.

Back to Melanie Philips then where she writes of a present day British Government, NuLabour, which "Despises anyone who loves Britain, its values and its history" - That's US. Me and YOU!

She forgot to add that the Conservative Party, LibDems or UKIP are no different incidentally but saying as she's a Tory I can forgive her oversight. I on the other hand did not fail to see it and report it here.

But this system has been going a lot longer than 13 years under Labour.

Now just a cotton-picking minute. 
Instead of you thinking potatoes, think cotton.

Think about 'slavery' and the poor cotton-pickers in the deep south of the USA.

And putting aside the injustice of all of the issues surrounding slavery which any right minded person would abhor, please think for a minute who actually benefited from it and who met the cost of the 'services' for the 'slaves'?

The plantation owner met their costs in terms of health and housing, meals and such like and he got rich because he paid no wages. Meanwhile, Americans couldn't get jobs and were left penniless and the common answer to that was 'they won't work the fields'.

But in today's 'Global Economy', with free movement of people, it is now 'the state' that meets the cost of economic slaves who come to work for lower wages whilst the traders; e.g; governments and the potato-bagger's carpetbaggers of this world, get 'rich', whilst "our schools are producing people who are unemployable".

I haven't written about the consequences to our culture and to our society in terms of a growing deprivation and poverty, but if you're smart you will see it is heading to our very own extinction as a people unless it is stopped and reversed.

It MUST be reversed to enable cultures and races to survive, and that's just a plain mathematical fact.

Unless it is reversed, and a system is developed whereby the cost of services are covered by those who make themselves rich. 

i.e. Businesses,  and the employed  taxpayers get a fairer deal as opposed to  a government with perpetual borrowing. Then our country is heading further into bankruptcy, economic decline, and eventual political and social collapse.  It's that simple!

As Frank Field indicates, unless immigration is halted then there will be real "civil unrest on the streets of Britain", and the only way to stop it is if the government changes its immigration policy, changes the benefit system and puts in place a system of "job guarantees", so that people being produced by schools are not unemployable, they have the means to support themselves, because they have an income, they can build families and maintain the productive cycle of our people, so that our people do not become "extinct" as a result of economic slavery whilst fat cat bankers and their mates get to sit sipping Gin & Tonic's on their yachts in the Bahamas think what a wonderful Global Economy this is. - GET IT!

Now take a look at British National Party POLICIES on the economy, education and agriculture and see whether you feel like me, that these would be fairer and more beneficial to our society:

ECONOMY – British workers first!

Globalisation, with its export of jobs to the Third World, is bringing ruin and unemployment to British industries and the communities that depend on them. Accordingly, the BNP calls for the selective exclusion of foreign-made goods from British markets and the reduction of foreign imports. We will ensure that our manufactured goods are, wherever possible, produced in British factories, employing British workers. When this is done, unemployment in this country will be brought to an end, and secure, well-paid employment will flourish, at last getting our people back to work and ending the waste and injustice of having more than 4 million people in a hidden army of the unemployed concealed by Labour’s statistical fiddles. We further believe that British industry, commerce, land and other economic and natural assets belong in the final analysis to the British nation and people. To that end we will restore our economy and land to British ownership. We also call for preference in the job market to be given to native Britons. We will take active steps to break up the socially, economically and politically damaging monopolies now being established by the supermarket giants. Finally we will seek to give British workers a stake in the success and prosperity of the enterprises whose profits their labour creates by encouraging worker shareholder and co-operative schemes

EDUCATION – discipline, standards, achievement!

We are against the ‘trendy’ teaching methods that have made Britain one of the most poorly educated nations in Europe. We will end the practice of politically correct indoctrination in all its guises and we will restore discipline in the classroom, give authority back to teachers and put far greater emphasis on training young people in the industrial and technological skills necessary in the modern world. We will also seek to instill in our young people knowledge of and pride in the history, cultures and heritage of the native peoples of Britain.

AGRICULTURE – quality before quantity!

We see a strong, healthy agriculture sector as vital to the country. Britain’s farming industry will be encouraged to produce a much greater part of the nation’s need in food products. Priority will be switched from quantity to quality, as we move from competing in a global economy to maximum self-sufficiency for Britain. We will ensure a major shift to healthier and more sustainable organic farming. We are pledged to ensure the restoration of Britain’s once great fishing industry with the re imposition of the former exclusion zones around our coast.

Or maybe you want more of this?

British Taxpayers Pay for their Own Ethnic Cleansing

The Muslim who wants to make Britons "irrelevant" with Government backing

Muslim Shahid Malik MP said;

"It is almost 10 years since the Government passed the Race Relations (Amendment) Act in response to Lord Macpherson’s seminal report into the death of Stephen Lawrence. I believe that report and our response to it present a watershed in the history of race equality and race relations in this country."

"In 1997 the then Prime Minister Tony Blair laid out the challenge: “We cannot be a beacon to the world unless the talents of all the people shine through. Not one black High Court judge, not one black Chief Constable or Permanent Secretary; not one black army officer above the rank of colonel. Not one Asian either. Not a record of pride for the British establishment. Not a record of pride for Parliament, that there are so few black and Asian MPs.”

 Result One:

Metropolitan Police Commander Ali Dizaei has been sentenced to four years for assaulting and falsely arresting a man in a dispute over £600.

Southwark Crown Court was told Waad Al-Baghdadi was arrested by Dizaei in a row over work on the officer's website.

Dizaei, 47, was convicted of both misconduct in a public office and perverting the course of justice.

Prosecutor Peter Wright QC said he was guilty of a "wholesale abuse of power" motivated by self-interest and pride.

Muslim Shahid Malik MP said;

Today we have more reasons to be proud - since 1997 we have and have had ethnic minorities as Chief Constables, Permanent Secretaries, High Court judges, an Admiral and currently we have five ethnic minority MP’s who are Government Ministers.

These achievements are a testament to how Britain’s ethnic minority communities have strived to succeed, often against the odds and are a clear demonstration of how our society and public services have been transformed over the last few years.

In this statement we set out the excellent progress that has been made in the last few years in tackling inequalities in education, employment housing, health and criminal justice. We are also acutely aware that many challenges still remain and that we do not live in a ‘post-racial’ society. Spatial and social segregation still blights too many part so of our country and serves to hinder the fight against racism and extremism.

Result Two:

Muslim Shahid Malik MP said;

We know that Islamaphobia is a very significant challenge moving forward fuelled by a false belief that Islam and terrorism are linked. The speed and size of immigration from Eastern Europe has also brought new challenges to our shores. To put this in context, in absolute terms the Poles have achieved immigration in one year that took those originally from Bangladesh some forty years to achieve.

Of course there is still discrimination and disadvantage faced by some that has nothing to do with size or the pace of change – Gypsy travellers still face a profoundly stubborn form of bigotry and disadvantage and we know that anti-Semitism spikes correlate directly with activity in the Middle East. Hence, the challenges remaining are more complex with social disadvantage, race and religion impacting on people’s life chances.

Result Three:

Muslim Shahid Malik MP said;
 

In order to create a society at ease with it’s diversity we have to ensure that all are confident that government policies are based on fairness and not favours and we do this by ensuring that the rights and responsibilities that we share are common to us all thus making your race, religion or social class near irrelevant. I believe that we must become a society that accepts and celebrates both our commonality and our diversity. We are much closer today than we were but we cannot be complacent. This statement sets out how we will continue the progress that we have made and I look forward to ensuring that it continues.

Result Four:

In June 2001 Malik was arrested and allegedly beaten by police during racially motivated riots in Burnley.

In April 2003 Malik won a public apology and "substantial" libel damages after being wrongly accused of throwing bricks during the riots in the Lancashire Evening Telegraph on 17 January 2002. Malik's lawyer told the High Court in London: "At the time referred to in the article, he was in fact acting as a mediator and peacemaker in a volatile situation following disturbances in Burnley. LINK

Wanted for Crimes Against the British People

Charge: Crimes Against Humanity

The British Government

Recent news reveals a government conspiracy to change forever the social fabric of British society and the indigenous culture of Britons. OUR culture and OUR identity. The conspiracy was revealed following months of requests for government documents, hitherto held secret from the British people, which evidences the conspiracy to eradicate our people by means of mass immigration, whilst attacking dissenters as "ill-educated", racists and bigots.

The British Government even designed a policy, benignly entitled "Reporting Diversity" with an introduction entitled "How Journalists can Contribute to Community Cohesion", whilst the National Union of Journalists - NUJ - joined IMRAX, a politically funded and controlled media group which constantly monitors and reports media stories and ensures they fall in line with 'policy' to not make any reference to the ethnic, racial or religious backgrounds of criminals when reporting crimes.

The British government, as shown by the document 'Reporting Diversity', can be seen to threaten journalists with race laws if they fail to adhere to government media policy which is intended not to offer the full story but instead to offer the public its own political bias in order to maintain the conspiracy against its own people which would eventually see Britain as a place where indigenous Britons, British culture, and the 'white race', ceased to exist.

They planned it, they conspired, and they all but completed it with the assistance of the Conservative, LibDems and UKIP (Old Tories) Parties, and together they began to re-cast the British people as racists whilst they adopted positive discrimination and race laws to prevent us speaking out.

They also directed immigrants into high office where they could make decisions which would lead to irreversible psychological indoctrination of their multicultural, diverse and global politic, through our TV screens, our police force, our county councils, our NHS and our education systems including our universities and even our primary schools.

So assured were they of victory over the British people, born by an ideological desire to change the people of Britain. They ignored our dissent, ignored our democratic freedoms, ignored our sovereignty as a people, and made ready their further plans even to ban our political route to reverse their hideous and evil crimes against us.

Their Crimes

Of course it isn't easy to believe that your own government would want rid of you. It comes difficult for some, especially if they've been subjected to years of indoctrination through all of the above measures. It is difficult to see yourself as a victim when you feel no pain and when you're unaware of the crimes being perpetrated against others, or of the act of a government conspiring against you. You are faced with a choice to believe or disbelieve, but it becomes harder not to believe if you read and bother to understand the evidence.

Just like you would not perhaps notice your home had been burgled whilst you were away on holiday until you returned to see it was empty, unless someone informed you, it would come as a shock to know that your possessions which took a lifetime to accumulate, had gone forever and the cops didn't care, nor did the government and nor did the media because they were the people who'd committed the crime.

Legal Definition of a Crime Against Humanity

There are of course many crimes against humanity but broadly what they fall into are deprivations of the most fundamental rights of a human being.

Most people wouldn't argue that a crime had been committed if innocent people were intentionally bombed in their homes of course, or if a government conducted methods of torture.

But what of other classifications of crimes against humanity that are not immediately apparent?

The International Criminal Court defines a Crime against humanity as;

"A term used by, within and as so defined by the International Criminal Court treaty and including any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack"

1 Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law.

2 ‘Persecution’ means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity.

I'm not a Lawyer but isn't Trevor Philips attempting with government assistance, to obliterate the identity of the British people as represented as the indigenous British people, as stated in the British National Party's Constitution?

Also, has the government not a) Intentionally sought to remove our fundamental right to national identity by its illegal giving away of our nation to the European Union, and b) with its program of mass extermination of our identity and culture by way of the measures it has and still is taking in terms of immigration, media, and statutory instruments which are all pointed in one direction, toward us, the indigenous people of Britain who's government "by their deeds ye shall know them" as our enemy?

So too, all those who support a regime, its components and its ranks of conspirators, many which have been named in these Green Arrow articles and others, including who they like to tell us and have us believe are their political 'opponents'. Yet who else opposes them other than the British National Party?

Regular readers of this blog are of course very familiar with the enemy as British Patriots know a thing or two about persecution, having felt it first hand these last 20 odd years.

This information therefore is not to them, it is to the sleepers. Those who still support a regime and a political system along with the rabid enemy who they think have clean hands in this persecution. Yet they know Cameron supports UAF, they know Brown is one of the culprits, they know none of the others has spoken out in defence of the persecuted British people, yet they still offer 'support' to our enemies.

Lest we forget those before us, you might want to reflect now on who your friend is and decide whether you stand for the British people or whether you will stand with the enemy, for some of the British people will NEVER give in and nor will the British National Party.

JACK STRAW, QUESTION TIME and TERRORISTS

English Lawyer Sir Thomas More, was one of the most famous early Lord Chancellors to serve England. This early Lord Keeper of the Seal was executed on order of the death penalty under King Henry VIII, and was later canonized by the Catholic Church. The late 'Saint' Thomas More as he became known in Catholic circles, was perhaps a highly respectable character, or not as the case may be for it really depends on who's writing history.

Thomas More 1478-1535

But the purpose of this particular account of history falls to men like me, and in this instance my interest is not Saint Thomas More but his living reincarnate Smirking Jack Straw, our present Keeper of the Seal. Straw was of course given his appointment by his fellow conspirator Gordon Brown who then together set about treason and corruption of the constitutional position of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II , and ending her power over parliament when one of Straw's first acts as Justice Minister was to remove the Royal Prerogative.

'Smirking' Jack Straw also just happens to be the Member of Parliament for Blackburn at the moment and unfortunately we no longer lob the heads off traitors else I'd be giving you a more celebratory account of Jack Straw's place in British history. 

Rather than simply bringing you news of his further misdeeds, incompetences and treasonable crimes against us, I'd happily be engaged in writing an account of British Justice being meted out against this pompous, so called Justice Minister, who appeared to have his very own Al'Qaeda terror Network running around underneath his smirking Marxist snout doing 'exercises' in the local park.

I wonder if he enjoyed canvassing their votes last election?

I'm aware there is a mountain of history to write about this poor excuse for a man, who eagerly sought to have the rigged Question Time audience berate leader of the British National Party, Mr Nick Griffin MEP who's father DID turn up to help defend this nation during World War II, unlike Straw's who was by all accounts a conscientious objector chicken who did NOT. So the old saying like father like son surely still applies now just as it did in Thomas More's days as far as Smirking Jack Straw is concerned.

Did you knock on this guys door Jack?

How about these two Jack?

Surely you know your own constituents Jack?

You see Jack, the thing is, they know you. They must do otherwise they wouldn't have set up a terror cell in England. It stands to reason they'd do that with you making Islam all welcome an all whilst celebrating the fact you hate us English. Surely?

You see when you said; "The English Are Not Worth Saving as A Race", I wonder if you stopped to think that the English would remember you Jack?

People like myself will surely never let you forget what you said about us Jack, and I for one would be happy to see the smirk wiped off your Marxist face.

Nick Griffin didn't get the time to do it on Question Time Jack, so I wonder if you'd have at it again without the screaming rigged audience next time?

You see when Nick castigated you for calling HIM a racist, but was gracious enough not to mention your own betrayal of the British people and their Queen, I am not so inclined to let slip the fact that the very next day, news was released that you and your former conspirator Blair, had together perpetrated an act so secretly callous against our people when you dreamt up the heinous act of changing our culture forever with mass immigration these last 13 years. I think I'd like Nick to ask you about that.

I don't suppose it had anything to do with you wanting lots of Al'Qaeda supporters to vote for you, so maybe you would like the chance to explain?

Maybe you can tell us Jack, why your father was a coward, how you did not follow his path in life, why you said we English were a race yet now deny our existence, why you tried desperately to kill us off as a race with mass colonisation of our country, why you took away the Royal Prerogative to prevent you from doing it, why you 'amended' the Treason Act to remove the Death Penalty, and why you are happy to celebrate the enriched and diverse 'culture' in Blackburn  where you were 'apparently' unaware there were terrorists in the local park?

Will you be answering these questions before or after the General Election Jack or will you just keep being the coward that you are whilst shouting "racist" to those of us who oppose your very existence in our country, along with the rest of your terrorist government?

INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IN BRITISH POLITICS

It doesn't really matter whether we agree or disagree with Israel's repatriation policy for they are not the point of the article. British politicians readiness to LIE about us is the point of the article, which is made clear by the headline, that they are institutionally racist AGAINST US.

"Thank you Leonard and thank you everyone for coming today. It’s great to be here amongst so many friends. I look around and I see Conservative candidates and I see Conservative supporters, I see some of our biggest donors and a special thank you to you."

Not my words, but those of small 'c' Conservative Party leader David Cameron at his speech to the CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ANNUAL LUNCH which was held in London on 18TH JUNE last year.

Cameron supporters must surely be wondering about a few things here, as to who Cameron is actually 'supporting', when it comes to Israel or Britain for that matter.

 

I know as a long standing former Tory supporter myself, I would be very interested to know about the man leading my party wouldn't you?

 

You see, some of us - BNP supporters - KNOW who our leader is, we know what he thinks, we know what he says, and we know what our policies are. But do Tories know what their policies are, I think not.

For instance, how does Cameron explain his support for Israel when it has an openly racist repatriation policy, whilst at the same time proclaiming Israel his 'friend', and the British National Party his 'enemy'?

BBC report on Israel

You see the above report by the BBC, clearly shows that Israel is adopting a repatriation policy for illegal AND legal immigrants, including "non-Jewish" children who were born in Israel, don't have another home to go to, are completely unfamiliar with any country other than their legal home of Israel, yet despite this policy is shoved onto the smallest page by the BBC and not made too much fuss of (which I found anyway), Cameron and the rest of his hammer throwing fascist lunatics meanwhile, chant that it is British Nationalists who are "racist"?

BBC says;

"The government is trying to reduce the number of foreign workers with no Jewish heritage in the country, even though many now have families who consider themselves Israeli."

 Oh, bye the way the BBC hasn't written it but the report does say that the Israeli Govt has made it ILLEGAL for immigrants to have children Mr Cameron. What's your thoughts on that mate?

Well I know I'm stating the obvious here, especially when we're told by Mail Online only yesterday, that the British Labour Government deliberately began to call the British people racists if they dared to make an objection to it's policy to wipe us out as a people, but, well, I just wondered if either of them could get past the lies for a second to explain this?

You see there's nothing else about this in any of the other state controlled media, and BBC has pushed it into a tiny box so no one can find it. But I really thought I'd best ask my mate Bertie to capture the footage just in case the political traitors (including the media), tried to deny it next time they shout racist to BNP members.

Okay, so I'm waiting but I guess we'll have to wait. Marxists never recant anything they just invent another lie and bury evidence you see. But saying as I'm here, I might as well bring to people's attention BNP Policy on immigration and repatriation just in case there are any who have not yet made their mind up to vote for their country with the BNP, or for lying scum like the LibLabUKIPCon.

BNP Immigration Policy is clearly NOT racist, as it offers repatriation ONLY to those immigrants who are unable to assimilate with Britain. i.e. Those we would naturally feel were here in our country, taking jobs, services and benefits, whilst shouting they hate us.

I dare say that the LibLabUKIPCon Party could fit into that category but I doubt they'd want to go!

The second part of our policy is to repatriate ILLEGAL immigrants.

Now these two policies are precisely the same as Labour Policy which the Tories will follow if they gain access to a position where they can commit more treason against our country for reason they are both sucking up to every minority in the country bar us. i.e. The indigenous British people who they betrayed.


Now let's have that again Cameron, just in case you missed it.

You said;
 

"First, I passionately believe in the right of Israel to exist, to defend itself and to live in peace and security. Not just because of the tragedies of history. Not only because of the realities of today. Not simply because of my Party’s unstinting support for Israel through the decades. But also because it’s something I feel very deep inside of me. The belief I have in Israel is indestructible – and you need to know that if I become Prime Minister, Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on Israel. But as well as being an unswerving friend, I believe Israel needs true friends.".......Said David two faced Cameron.

Now it's over not to lying Cameron or Brown because I don't really have any interest in what liars and traitors have to say quite frankly, unless it's their last words before I apply the blindfold. But it's over to patriots here, including ALL patriots who are deciding who best to support to bring our great nation back to its former peaceful state for ALL our people and not just minorities here, and not just whites (or Jews in the case of Isreal), but for ALL our people who love this country and are legitimate British citizens whether they are indigenous or civically British.

Love for your country has no bounds unless you're Brown or Cameron.

Their hatred for the British people and the British National Party has had no parallel and it is all aimed at YOU from the LibLabUKIPCon Party with its hammer-throwing henchmen UAF and others who are now infiltrated by traitors, and the media which is mainly owned by foreigners, all seeking to dumb you down like they have our nation, our people, our sovereignty, our wealth, our political routes to protest and even our system of government along with our democracy.

When are you going to wake up to truth?

How long will it take those political sleepers to recognise the institutional racism in British politics today?

'Iran will chop off attackers' hands' says Ahmadinejad

 

LINK

Iran will cut off the hands of anyone who attacks the country, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned on Tuesday. "No power can harm Iran ... The Iranian nation will chop off the hands from the arm of any attacker from any part of the world," Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech in eastern Khorasan-e Jonubi province, according to a Reuters translation.

He denied that Iran was developing nuclear weapons

Ahmadinejad went on to accuse Israel of being directly responsible for the January assassination of Hamas terror chief Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai. 

It comes a day after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu continued to publicly urge the world to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, even as Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that if Iran can’t have nuclear weapons, Israel should not be able to have them either.

An International Atomic Energy Agency report released last week suggested that Iran may be developing a nuclear warhead.

Labour Govt Brands BNP "Racist" to Prevent Opposition to Ethnic Genocide Plan

FILTHY LYING MARXIST LABOUR SCUM, AIDED AND ABETTED BY TOSSER CAMERON WHO THINKS WE HAVE MORE TO LEARN FROM KILLERS, RAPISTS AND DRUG PUSHERS THAN THEY DO FROM US!

Secret Labour plan to increase immigration said public's opposition was 'racist'

Daily Mail

Ministers were accused today of drawing up secret plans to increase immigration - and branding opponents of the controversial scheme 'racist'.

A previously unseen joint Cabinet Office and Home Office report called for increases in foreign workers to meet the Government's 'economic and social objectives'.

But it also stated that the public would be opposed to the shift because of 'racism' and urged ministers to try to alter public attitudes towards immigrants.

The document, which was written in July 2000 and released under the Freedom of Information Act, outlined plans for a step change in the number of both high and low skilled migrants.

A draft version of the report emerged last week, but the full copy was finally released today.

In it, the authors warned: 'Policy development is constrained by public opinion and the current tone of public debate.'

'It is correct that public opinion favours relatively restrictive policies on immigration.'

Sections advising ministers to adopt a 'clear strategy for public opinion and public debate' to change views were removed from the published version.

Critics said the document showed ministers 'deliberately rode roughshod' over the public.

There was outrage last year after Andrew Neather, a former Labour speechwriter, revealed in a newspaper column that the loosening of controls in the early 2000s was part of a deliberate political agenda.

The 'immigration boom' of the last decade was engineered in part to change society by making it more multicultural, he said.

Mr Neather, who worked for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett and saw the early versions of the report, said senior politicians were nervous about publicising the policy because they feared public reaction.

The report states baldly that public opposition to immigration was 'closely correlated with racism'.

Exposing the public to migrants would make them less hostile, it said.

'A new approach to migration policy ... would need to be not only accompanied by, but underpinned by, a clear strategy for public opinion and public debate.

'Government has tended to assume that negative public opinion on migration is a given that is beyond its control.

'In fact, research (and common sense) suggests that past governments have had a significant influence on public opinion...'

'On other issues, government has been strategic and proactive in addressing public opinion, it could do so on migration.

'Recent research shows that anti-immigrant sentiment is closely correlated with racism rather than economic motives,' the authors wrote.

'Education and people's personal exposure to migrants make them less likely to be anti-migrant.

'The most negative attitudes are found among those who have relatively little direct contact with migrants, but see them as a threat.'

The report said immigration was rising sharply because of global economic forces but said it was all but pointless trying to prevent large numbers of new arrivals coming for work.

It stated: 'Trying to halt or reverse market driven migration will be very difficult (perhaps impossible) and economically damaging.'

Trying to stop low skilled workers was 'neither an available nor a desirable policy choice' because of 'market forces'.

The report went through numerous drafts during late 2000. One version was entitled Going with the Flow: Managing Migration in the 21st Century.

But by the time it was published in early 2001, the document had become a bland endorsement of the economic benefits of immigration.

Entire sections were removed, including all references to public opposition.

Instead it said: 'Social research shows that the majority consistently regards immigration as having a positive effect on British culture.

'This is true even for many of those who favour a more restrictive attitude to immigration controls.'

References to migration opening up 'new opportunities' for organised crime were also expunged.

The final report stated: 'There is little data specifically for migrants on such indexes of social exclusion as ... crime.'

Justice Secretary Jack Straw, who was Home Secretary from 1997 until 2001, has dismissed Mr Neather's claims, saying they were 'just untrue'.

A fortnight ago current Home Secretary Alan Johnson said the suggestion of an open door immigration policy was 'mythical'.

But Sir Andrew Green, chairman of pressure group Migrationwatch UK, said: 'This report confirms that ministers deliberately rode roughshod over public opinion in adopting a policy of mass immigration.

'They concealed their real intentions in the hope that they would benefit from the immigrant vote without losing their working class supporters.

'They are now paying the price.'

Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: 'The Government has simply not been telling the truth about its policies on immigration.

'More and more evidence is now emerging to show that they deliberately planned a big jump in immigration for their own political purposes.

'Now they are trying to rewrite history to pretend those decisions never happened. Their conduct over all of this has been a complete disgrace.'
Scribd documents
More Secret Immigration Plans on scribd

Occ67 Migration

Is this the Future of Britain without a BNP Government

Anyone who votes for the LibLabUKIPCon Party, is voting to bring about the end of Britain and the future death of their people, their culture, their country and possibly their own or their family members lives.

 

Video Footage is of January Rioting

It was the second episode of violence involving immigrants this year, after clashes in southern Italy in January brought about the worst racial violence in the country since World War Two and reignited a long-running debate on immigration.

The rioting began on Saturday evening after a 19-year-old Egyptian man, identified by police as Hamed Mamoud El Fayed Adou, was killed, apparently by a group of immigrants from South America.

Police said the North Africans, most of them Egyptians, went on a rampage and some clashed with police in the northeastern neighborhood where some 70 percent of shops are owned by immigrants.

Milan's deputy mayor, Riccardo De Corato, called the area a "Wild West between north African and South American gangs."

Police said they had identified more than 30 people involved, most of them Egyptian.

Ten Egyptians did not have regular residence permits, and four have been detained.

They were still searching for the South Americans believed to have been responsible for the killing, which they said took place after an argument on a city bus.

The Northern League, an anti-immigrant party in Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's center-right coalition, called for the immigrants responsible for the violence to be expelled. CALL FOR EXPULSIONS One Northern League member called for stiff controls and "expulsions house by house, floor by floor."

Milan, Italy's financial capital, is run by a center-right regional government and the opposition said that such riots showed that the government's immigration policy was in tatters.

"They (the center-right) govern the country, the (Lombardy) region and the city," said Pierluigi Bersani, head of the largest opposition party, the Democratic Party.

"They should accept the fact that their policy on integration and security has failed."

Italy's government last year approved tough legislation making it a felony to be an illegal immigrant or to help one. Immigrants without regular papers risk expulsion to their country of origin.

In early January, riots broke out in the Calabrian town of Rosarno when immigrants burned cars and broke store windows to protest against an attack on African farm workers by a gang of local white youths.

At least 53 people, including 18 policemen, were injured in the unrest in the town, located in Italy's southern toe. Authorities moved hundreds of people, mostly illegal temporary workers from sub-Saharan Africa, to immigrant centers in Italy for their protection.

Hat Tip: BC1959

(Writing by Philip Pullella and Marie-Louise Gumuchian; Editing by Dominic Evans) for Reuters

86% of Americans think their Sytem of Govt is Broken

Notice the message? - "Join or Die"

As a recent American poll shows 86% of Americans disillusioned with government, CNN holds a discussion on the subject of political culture in America which has recently seen a rapid rise of unconventional and non-political figures in the Tea Party Convention, where a new wave of people politics is capturing large audiences who "want their country back".

If you check out the American mindset you'll find it not that much different to our own. Further, even the media and politicians use the same arguments against natural born Americans, who see the sovereignty of their country being taken away and their constitution trampled underfoot by liars who will say anything to hold on to power just as it is here.

"In politics in general, winning has become more important than working for the common good", says Democrat, former New Jersey Senator John Corzine, as he discusses American politics on CNN's 'State of the Union'.

Poll shows 86% of Americans believe the system of government is broken.


"That increase is highest among higher-income Americans and people who live in rural areas," said Keating Holland, CNN polling director. "Maybe it's just a coincidence, but those are the groups that make up the bulk of the Tea Party activists today."

Poll shows demographics of Tea Party activists

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll was conducted February 12-15, with 1,023 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

The above clip shows a discussion on Prime Time US TV which looks at the political landscape in America, and attributes political disillusion to a change in culture where politicians need to get back to representing the people rather than trying to 'win'. You may think the two are the same, but if you consider who politicians try to gain votes from, and consider the types of people who tend to be more actively engaged in active politics, then you should begin to understand that those tend to be minority groups rather then the majority of people who fall into the main voter category. i.e. White heterosexuals.

What else can you expect to see in government when large numbers of the population don't bother to vote but instead seem happy to watch television soaps?

Of course America isn't alone in this. I bet if you took a poll anywhere across Europe or Great Britain, you find identical results, and yet despite there is a clear national or patriotic fervour beginning to rise, politicians looking for votes, are still doing their level best to pander to any minority they can get close to.

I hope they are wrong, and I hope the mass majority of good hard-working decent Americans, Europeans and Brits, begin to wake up to the reality, that the only reason that governments are not working is because of THEIR OWN lazy attitude toward politics.

Lions led by Donkey's

Since I wrote about Bully Boy Brown, it looks like the storm still carries on.

I guess there's no actual real news to report except Brown's antics in Number 10, and well, it does give the government propaganda machine something to use as a distraction to the utter failure of its policies to deliver anything other than betrayal of the British people. There's a story I guess from the opposition policies which is intended to win over ethnic Joe Public, women and gays, which under a cover of fairness, diversity and a 'new modern and progressive Conservatism', bullying politicians who have no interest in what British white heterosexual males think can think they can dress up their politically corrupt policies in Orwellian doublespeak and hope we're all daft enough to fall for it.

And what's happening in the lives of Eastenders stars, or am  I alone in thinking this is a question which only completely indoctrinated idiots would ask themselves?

Talking about idiots, LibDem leader Nick Clegg has jumped on the media bandwagon today like a character from a puppet theatre, shouting 'that's the way to do it', with the always obvious Liberal 'warning' that "this is very serious".  Excuse me if I don't insert his photograph at this point please but I'm afraid my blog couldn't handle the pain of looking at the odd fellow.

Okay, so it's back to bullying then. I was thinking about this again since the lady who confirmed many members of Number 10 had contacted her, had stepped down after Number 10 denied it and she received an email from an angry bullying Labour MP who apparently retorted with a degree of displeasure that the truth was out about his leader. Rather than saying 'well done' for all the hard work you do in stopping bullies in politics, we have him saying he'll never advise his constituents to use the service again. He missed the point didn't he? Surely, the point of an ordered society is that people are told the truth, feel included in the decision making process, and have some trust that their politicians are acting in their interests rather than their own, and without too much hypocrisy.

I guess politicians are quite happy to leave a bully in office then, and unlike a decent teacher who would want to stop it, politicians WANT us to be bullied. Not only do they lie to us but they bully us into quiet if we complain. How many media stories do I need put here to confirm the disgrace we have for a media too incidentally, which attacks and bullies the British National Party and its members who they have never met, whilst supporting government sponsored, hammer throwing fascist maniacs under a guise of 'anti-fascism'?

Brown has been caught in another lie, Cameron has been caught in his treason against the British people, and Clegg has been caught with his trousers round his ankles as far as his 'warning' is concerned. 

All we have here, are Lions led by Donkey's.