One type of person who is guaranteed to hack me off is an undemocratic, treasonous, son of a bitch liar. I can handle people with a warped sense of humour who make the odd cutting remark thinking it's funny, and I can even handle buffoons who have been indoctrinated with ideological claptrap if they speak honestly with their opinions. But since liars are never able to justify the comments they make or the lies they tell, well I feel they waste my time trying to bamboozle me, and I feel they are the scourge of mankind because they twist the thoughts and actions of others which may ultimately lead to death or never-ending slavery for others whilst unless challenged, the liar will generally continue to escape Scot-free until the history book catches up with him.
Our lives seem to be engaged in one massive lie these days. I don't know if you've noticed, but I certainly have. That was really the main reason I started writing to be honest because I was so damned sick of hearing lying politicians saying one thing one day and another the next, that I thought f*ck this, I'm going to do a rolling history book of my own. I started to write about one thing and before I was finished I generally realised they'd said something not quite too different a few weeks previously, and that's when I started to dig through past records and the like using the internet which took me into documents and reports I'd not seen. Documents like treaties for instance, and reports from papers I'd not read. These compiled together made me see more clearly, that all politicians bar none, are basically after the same thing. To persuade the public to support them, and they seem to stop at nothing when this concerns being elected in the next few weeks.
Oh my do the lies come out then!
I mean this isn't something I've just started to notice incidentally because I've always been aware that politicians lie, I just never really believed that they 'could lie all the time'. Hence, like others I traipsed along to polling booths, stuck a cross next to someone who I thought was honest, felt 'this guy will do what he says in his manifesto, will represent me and my country, and will generally not make a pigs ear of the economy, my ability to work, the rights I take for granted, or the culture I was raised to believe were part of an ongoing forward march into life betterment for people who think like me'.
That's the bit I got wrong of course as for the last 40 years I seem to have been taken in by these suckers like the rest of you. Nuff said then. I understand now that I'm a sucker, they are all lying pigs in shit, I should never trust them again, and I can only ever hope to place my mark against another politician who can clearly prove that his policies match the needs of my country.
So today I read a column on the Tory online website '
ConservativeHome', which offers the analogy that internet bloggers will be a bit of a problem because among other things, they check facts. I hope you are laughing here at this point?
What a shame I thought, as I contemplated the sham of politicians saying as little as possible on policy, making no promises 'until they see the books' etc, and meanwhile busily engaging themselves in handshakes and late night suppers to work on the next trick they have to pull tomorrow on their campaign trails. Can you see them chuckling with each other how they managed to sweeten the media, get a nice story out which would make them look good, pandered up to a few voters, and generally went to bed pleased with themselves that they had it in the bag that day, because I can but maybe I have a wilder imagination than most others I dunno. Maybe I just see things for how they really are or maybe I'm a bit of a dreamer, who can say. But one thing I do know is that a political manifesto carries no legal weight. i.e. It is a charter to lie. Secondly, I know false promises when I see them when I read the likes of Blair promising "We will hold a referendum on Europe", to find out that it really means "No we won't but there's f*ck all you can do about it".
Okay, I've had enough writing here. My mind is full of thoughts again, nothing too precise you understand. There's no news in the papers I've not already written about, and I feel I may be wasting my time a little wearing out the tips of my three typing fingers if I carry on much further. All I would say therefore, is look at BNP Policies and listen to the speeches of Nick Griffin MEP, Chairman and Party leader, and unless I'm to not be believed here, you will see what he says and what is written, has in fact not changed, and that's one main thing you don't have to contemplate when walking into that polling booth in the near future. (By the way, when is that date incidentally?)
I guess cattle don't really need to know when the slaughterman is coming to prod them in the head with his cattle rod. But just remember this. BNP policies are what they say on the tin. Other parties change theirs like weather cocks and what they say, really does depend on which way the wind blows until they are in power again and have no further need for you. Because once a liar always a liar, and that's the truth and not just my opinion but you'll really have to check it for yourself before the slaughterman comes with that rod to knock you on the head AGAIN at election time.
Update:
Just as Sod's law would have it, I just finished this writing here about how I feel about liars, and then had a look at this article on the
BBC about the arrest of UAF thug leader, and Fascist/Marxist Commie self-foot-shooter Weyman Bennett, and I see the BBC has graciously placed a link to BNP MEP,
Andrew Brons article, written on the BNP website. - Typical that I call them all liars and then they go and confirm my argument!
Investigations are continuing after police and thousands of protesters clashed at a demonstration in Bolton.
Thousands of Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and English Defence League (EDL) supporters gathered in Victoria Square on Saturday and dozens were arrested.
The EDL said it opposed "militant Islam" and Sharia law. The UAF accused the EDL of being a far-right party.
UAF joint secretary Weyman Bennett was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to organise violent disorder.
At least 74 people were arrested, police said. A number of people were injured during the demonstrations.
Mr Bennett, from Haringey, north London, said he was grabbed by officers while protesting peacefully.
He said: "I have been to more than 200 demos and never been arrested. There is no evidence against me. This is not a good sign for democracy.
"Officers came up to me as soon as I arrived and said they would arrest me. They are hostile to anti-racists and there needs to be an investigation.
"Police neutrality needs to be questioned."
Earlier, Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan said the number of arrests that were made was a clear indication that it was not a peaceful protest.
He said officers had faced a lot of hostility and would take swift action when confronted with disorder.
The force warned offenders would be identified from CCTV footage and brought to justice.
The protests started at about 1000 GMT. EDL protesters were later escorted away from Victoria Square by police and UAF supporters were told to disperse by about 1630 GMT.
Many shops and pubs closed in the area and most taxi firms pulled their drivers off the roads for fear of violence.
A notice on the EDL's website said its supporters would only protest peacefully, and UAF also described itself as a peaceful non-political group.
The two factions were separated by barriers on the steps of the town hall, which was boarded up.
The leader of Bolton Council, the Bishop of Bolton, and representatives from the Council of Mosques Hindu Forum wrote to Alan Johnson earlier this week asking for him to ban the demonstration, but were told it was not in his power to stop a protest.
Now I know an undercover cop has spilled the beans on government operating inside these anti-fascist groups, and I wrote about this yesterday. I would however, like to know:
a) Why Cameron, Lord of all stupidity, is supporting UAF
b) Why Peter Hain, the politician with a bad memory and a poor accountant but plenty of excuses when it comes to explaining how he didn't steal over a hundred grand of campaign money, supports UAF.
c) Why Trades Unions support UAF
d) How UAF manages to get coaches loads of hammer throwing Commie Marxist scum to cause violent disturbances anywhere in England at the drop of a hat with freshly made banners.
e) Where does their funding come from.
When I have the answers to those questions then I'll know precisely who it is in this country who is subverting democracy, because at the moment I only have a hunch that it is the government, the Labour Party, the Tory Party, tossers in Unions who like to throw hammers, students with messed up thinking, and criminals like Weyman Bennett who will hopefully be asked to tell us who his leaders are before election day unless he's another to end his days like Dr David Kelly in this Fascist/Marxist Commie regime, who's only aim in life is to destroy Britain and the British people with their lies.
f) Why has UAF, a known Marxist group bent on violent protest, born from Labour Party activists from such people who infested our country through Militant and others, in full support of Unions like 'Unite', a main contributor to the Labour Party and with known practices to protest against free speech, has not been BANNED, and furthermore, why those people like Cameron and Hain, are actively supporting this madness whilst trying their best with their lies to look respectable candidates for government?
Maybe the British people will for once wake up to the truth before it is hidden under yet another 70 year veil of lies, under the guise of 'National Security', and finally realise what that actually means. Because clearly it is THEIR OWN security they seek to protect not OURS.
