140% of Brits and Germans agree to dump the EURO

89% plus 51% = 140%

Yes, I can do statistics and use propaganda too, but in this case I'm not that far off 'The Mark' when I say that an overwhelming majority of sane people living in Germany and England, want the EURO to fall on its arse so we can end the stupidity of having some faceless shite in Brussels telling us not to use our own competitive trading skills in having our own elected government with balls enough to say NON to the French who love the Euro.

U.S. candidate wants utilitiy companies to check the immigration status of their customers

Well it sounds a good idea actually, since no utility company or for that matter, state or national body or corporation, should EVER provide ANYONE with a job, services or benefits without first ascertaining their legitimate legal status to actually be a customer otherwise I guess you could argue that THEY are aiding and abetting a crime just like you would say if our Home Office Minister employed an illegal immigrant without a passport check. - Oh, heck they did that didn't they. In fact our government hired 5,000 illegal immigrants as cleaners and security staff at the same time they were telling us their policy was British jobs for British workers.

But hey, if this guy gets his own way then maybe his idea will catch on.

What's it to be.......Afghan-fries or chips?

Some people I read over the last few years were ranting on about bio-metric chip implants being the fulfillment of prophetic doom for mankind, and I think they could be right. However, I tend to look at things a bit differently to many others and given my clear insight into what this is all about (sic), I'd have a damn good guess that money was really behind it rather than (just) a plot by Satanists.

In every political decision that was ever made, think money and you'll be at least part way to solving the true reason behind it.

Take these chips for instance. They already have us buying them for pets right. With police forces carrying scanners and computer codes and log ins to the uplink to trace a lost mutt. =  New Technology and MONEY.

Royal Mail sell off is Utter Bullshit

So the new bastards in parliament who cobbled themselves into a government, in a country which used to be a democracy, are going to privatise the Royal Mail. 

With a splash of bribery akin to the sell off of British Telecom shares back in the 80's when BT employees were given stakes in the business with shares whilst the govt permitted any other business to compete with it, and when they undercut BT with foreign labour working on part-time contracts, and call centres in India, BT staff found their shares had become nothing other than a straight swap for job security and  for some a life on the dole....

British Immmigration Problem

A break down is provided by The Daily Mail today which shows the disgrace of employment in Britain due to the governments policies of globalizing the workforce. It might also be a pertinent question to ask here, whether any study has been conducted in other countries - particularly those which we provide with aid - as to why their economies are considered third world status, why their health systems are abysmal, and why the death rates in those countries along with the standards of living, are hell compared to here. I don't suppose it has anything to do with the fact that British politicians and business leaders have robbed all the 'skilled' people from those countries at all would it?

This Mornings Propaganda Report

A quick read of the papers today made me wonder if there was anyone with any sense left in Britain.

The Guardian says it has leaked data showing George Osborne's budget will cost 1.3 million jobs over the next five years. It rabbits on about the job 'losses', yet fails to understand that these are jobs being paid by dwindling taxpayers to provide 'services' to an artificially bloated population, mostly by the bloaters of that population. i.e. IMMIGRANTS. (40% NHS remember), who are part of the artificially created economic growth we have in Britain where Britons themselves are mostly excluded because they 'just don't have the skills' to serve at McDonalds and Starbucks.

Don't Panic - It's just the end of life on Earth that's all

My God, just when I was beginning to get the hang of all the various conspiracy theories, finding out that many are, were, could be, true. I get a video emailed to me about the BP oil spill which reasonably leads the viewer to believe we could be heading toward an end of days scenario.

This video will lead you to a series of prophetic end of days disaster theories on the oil spill if you're finding it hard to stay awake at night and need something to keep you up at least one night with  nightmares. After that your natural human mentality is likely to kick in again, and you'll begin to believe what you want to believe because if you're like me, you might not be that bothered if the earth is going to end tonight or in the morning.

What we need is world revolution that's what we need, otherwise things will never change. 

U.S. Supreme Court - Individuals have more rights than states to possess guns for self-protection

In a victory for firearm owners, the Supreme Court has ruled as 'unconstitutional' the Chicago, Illinois', 28-year-old strict ban on handgun ownership which sought to enforce limits on its citizens to own weapons. Saying: "It cannot be doubted that the right to bear arms was regarded as a substantive guarantee, not a prohibition that could be ignored so long as states legislated in an evenhanded manner," wrote Justice Samuel Alito. LINK

The court has further ruled that individuals have equal or more power than states in the possession of certain guns for self-protection.

Toronto a "dystopian version of the future"

RT interviews Charlie Veitch of 'The Love Police', and Dan Dick after their campaigns at the G20 summit in Toronto.

Government against the People

If ever there was a need for ministers to have a chat with one another that need is now. It may perhaps lead to an end to the garbled messages coming from Frank Field and Teresa May for instance and it could also end the idea that businesses as opposed to people are the electorate.

Teresa May promised control over immigration yet Willets and Hove say it will harm business to impose a cap on immigrants.

Just to highlight 'the problem', Sky News showed a Chinese businesswoman who caters for visits to the far east, saying she needs people who have the language skills and that's why she needs immigrants. Adding, that there is a shortage of language skills in Britain.

Why was a Chinese woman permitted to set up this business which has no capability to trade and is intentionally not reliant on the British workforce? - Answer = government policy which tells us that globalisation is good for Britain.

But that was only one business, what about the other 'skills' we don't have? - Answer = They won't tell us because their excuse is built on lies.

The simple way to deal with immigration is to tell the people what skills they are lacking and then the people can go get them. Secondly, that business needs are placed second to social needs in terms of employment. i.e. Go get tough with businesses which are hiring foreign labour rather than training the indigenous workforce in whatever skills they say are lacking, and they won't then be making demands upon government and people like Willets and Hove will begin to see that this country belongs to the people and not to some Chinese Businesswoman who takes immigrants who can speak Chinese, on trips to the far east.

Frank Field is blaming single fathers for the ills of an overburdened benefits system I see. He says we (as in the people), need to lose our 'obsession' of getting single mothers into work. He's obviously either not bothered reading the ConLibDem policy on this or he's deliberately trying to unhinge it. Some of what he says is right incidentally, except he places the blame on single fathers for being out of work, rather than on businesses for failing (or refusing), to hire them.

He also appears to consider that the government has no duty or responsibility in this social problem which affects the entire nation, as he is calling for benefits to be stopped for those who refuse a job.

He may have forgotten that we have over a million illegal immigrants in the country and I doubt that they can all be picking potatoes.

He may also have forgotten that his government stopped training indigenous nurses and doctors and hired them instead from India and Pakistan and the Philippines.

So much so, that now 40% of our NHS is staffed by immigrants whilst millions of indigenous Britons (many of whom are single fathers), remain UNEMPLOYED.

His government interfered with the natural cycle of business, yet is not able for some inexplicable reason to interfere (or rather take social responsibility) in other businesses.

They really do need to get their heads together because fathers are not unemployed by choice, they are unemployed because no one cares about society. Hence, we have a policy to get mothers into work rather than praising the benefits to a child of having a full-time mother. And they are trying to turn society against unemployed single fathers instead of asking themselves what they did as politicians to help the people they asked to vote.

Until politicians switch their minds on to the real needs of society instead of harping on about what business wants, then we will remain doomed to destruction as a people and also as a country.

I'm afraid this is a forgone conclusion unless politicians start to represent the views of the people.

Generally speaking, fathers want to be able to provide. Mothers want to mother. Governments need to take notice of the fundamental needs of people rather than listening to some Chinese woman who came here to set up a business to make herself rich.

People are not only the last thing on the minds of those in government but government itself is  actually working against the people.

Oh, I wonder when Frank Field will let on who the single fathers and drug traffickers are, and whether he'll tell the people that they are mostly IMMIGRANTS?

Celente Latest

LINK

The Government has Katrina quality rescue skills ...these are not my leaders they could not lead me across the street , we are seeing a workers of the world 2.0 ,we are looking at as the government loses control either by false flag or real they tend to exercise more control , it is as old as the Old Testament...Gerald Celente : America will look like Detroit more foreclosures more empty homes more crime ....

Protests in Toronto over G20 summit

Not one word more from me about Goyim.

When we leave the house we 'go out'. But we have to 'go in' somewhere else so when we go out we 'go in' to the 'outside' or else we'd be nowhere and that's impossible.  But if we go  out to the 'INN',  then we'd be out and in at the inn both at the same time, and that's how confusing words can be sometimes because you can't be out and in at the same time because that's impossible.

Confused? Well it's intentional. Because just as we give meanings to words, we must realise that others give their own meanings sometimes to the same sounding words and sometimes to the exact same words we ourselves use.

Take a simple word like in (or inn), and an audience of a few people, and already you can see with what I have written here, how easy it would be to confuse them.

Bell - for instance is to me a good word which signifies a sound I like and it makes me think of churches, but if you want to check its origin you will find its root is in the Latin word 'bellum' which is war. You might think as I do, that when churches 'ring their bells', they are ringing them in a good way. You might also think they're a tad noisy on a Sunday morning and you may in fact not like them I don't know as I can only speak for me and how I feel about 'bells'. But if you know the origin of that word then you might appreciate that some people would think church bells are ringing for war.

Words, Symbols and Conspiracies

Daniel Estulin exposes Bilderberg to the European parliament.

Some people apparently 'don't believe' in conspiracies. It makes no sense to think others who collectively agree decisions without informing the people are not in fact 'conspiring'. I suggest the unbelievers look up the meaning of the word conspiracy before they launch into their little tirades to those who do actually understand the meaning of it. - Conspiracies exist and that's a fact otherwise the people would know EVERYTHING. - Thus, when we hear of a climate change agenda and the 15th meeting, yet we were not told about the other 14, we KNOW that we haven't been informed and our decisions have been ignored. Same with the EU, UN, IMF, - and Bilderberg.

A bit of England as we remember it - The Keel Row song

I brought to mind a song from the days of my childhood called "The Keel Row song", and thought I'd hunt it down on YouTube along with the lyrics of what is indisputably a Northumbrian folk song which would be magic if it were revived. But then whence wading through YouTube and coming across this video/audio, I happened to discover an English lady singer of whom prior to this I was completely unaware.

Her name? - Kathleen Ferrier.

Dr David Kelly's death was no "Mystery"

Again, there is no 'mystery' surrounding the cause of a death which has not been 'unequivocally proven', as the establishment would have us believe, because his alleged suicide has not been fully investigated. i.e. The public has not been given full scrutiny of the events leading up to his untimely and tragic death, nor have they been witness to the full circumstances, medical evidence and other factual evidences which exist within a box marked do not open for reasons of national security. If any 'mystery' exists it is with the reason why govt closed the file on it and referring to something not yet revealed because of direct action to hide it, makes it not a mystery but rather a conspiracy of silence. And that is no mystery either for they conspire with everything under the tag of national security and we people are worth buck shit when it comes to demanding truth be told.

Yet another year goes by in our economy and still nowt done

So checking back, 5 months ago ( there are earlier posts ), I got to wondering how much if any of this had actually been done by government and where we are in terms of saving our economies. Yes there have been 'bailouts' but to what cost and to what result? Are the worlds economies saved yet? NO! So I wonder what the cost would have been if governments had actually made an attempt to save the economy?

What! - You mean they tried? - You tell me.
Warning turned out to be a prediction come true!

October 20th 2008
It seems no one is showing much of a clue when it comes to having a workable strategy to save the housing market. Homeowners, the building trade, home values, or getting the market started again must be made a prime strategy of government if this downward spiral is to be broken.

The housing market needs buyers.
Buyers need incomes and jobs.
Builders need a growing market and house buyers in order to stay in business.
Homeowners need to know their assets are not withering away due to lack of demand.
Lenders need their money back or they need regular payments from their customers otherwise they'll go down the tubes too.

Tories flannel on immigration whilst Liberals are just outright racists

I read this mornings Daily Mail which has a report that the racist liberal coalition of Tories and LibDems, will impose an immediate cap on immigration from non-EU countries.

Gerald Celente - "The Entire System is Collapsing"

Obama - The Scariest Picture You’ll Ever See by Chip Wood

Take a good long look at the map below. Pay special attention to the areas that are in blue. Compare them, in size and location, to the areas that are in red. Then let me tell you why the numbers (and the colors) are so significant.

What you’re looking at is a map of the 2008 Presidential election, broken down by the results in each county. 

If Barack Obama received most of the votes in a particular county, it appears in blue. If John McCain was the winner, that county is in red.

If you added up the land mass of every blue and red county you’d see something really striking—the Republicans won 80 percent of this country, when measured by acreage. John McCain got a majority of votes in 2,417,000 square miles of the United States. Barack Obama, by comparison, won in just 580,000 square miles.

KFC RETREAT ON HALAL MEAT

KFC has been forced to ditch their halal-only menus at some of its stores after disappointing sales.

It's all well and good shouting about it but what the fuck are you doing!

Maybe I should just be lying back and having a laugh here like the unelected bastards who are increasing OUR retirement ages whilst keeping their fat arses warm with pay offs and pensions that defy any scrap of logical measurement in terms of what any sane person could call 'fair'.

BNP and Bilderberg

BNP and Bilderberg is a video which shows investigator and author Daniel Estulin giving information about the Bilderberg Group to the European Parliament 2 weeks ago. He makes the point that those who support Bilderbergers are not patriots but rather they are traitors to their countries, traitors to their people and are traitors to humanity itself.

George Soros, who I call the Orange Man of the Bilderberg Group  has launched economic attacks on countries, given money to political factions to create revolutions, and  has created war by proxy with the provision of arms. Ukraine and Georgia are just two of the countries he has involved himself but also look at Poland and Afghanistan pre-Russian / Afghanistan war in the 80's and then look at CIA operations in Iran at the same time period and you'll find this Orange Man lurking in the midst of it all with his Bilderberg friend and former CIA Op George Bush Snr.

These men are warmongers, same as Blair, Bush Snr, Clinton, Bush Jnr, and now Obama.

They are all inextricably linked to Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Tri-Lateral  Commission which is Bilderberg with a Japanese stamp on it, and they have absolutely NOTHING to add to the world of political thought except to do what it takes to maintain THEIR own sorry arses in the same 'political game', which is about creating a New World Order of One World Government.

Nationalism is a 'natural' thing for all people to feel. It is the essence of mankind's survival., and without a bond which ties man together with his neighbour, his friend, his family and his ancestral past and future, then mankind itself is nothing more than an economic slave to global corporations.

These men are the equivalent of Satan's messengers on earth and there are many who will willingly listen to these devils in order to feed their own greed.

Their days, as are those of their NWO bosses, are numbered as people are waking up to their conspiracy which I see is gathering today in the shape of the G20 summit meeting in what we are told is an effort to avoid a 'second' recession. (When did their first 'recession' end)?

Incidentally, there are many siren voices on our side if you look for them. Example, Norman Tebbit who wrote an article the other day calling for a halt to third world immigration. Another guy I could mention is the journalist Leo McKinstry who wrote this article 3 years ago for the Sunday Express - LINK

The difference between them and us is that they pose no threat and the answer is simple. They didn't raise a political movement to fight them like Nick Griffin did with the British National Party, and that is why they must obliterate patriots because only nationalists and patriots can possibly defeat their aims.

It is quite obvious when you look at it properly that all cultures except western cultures are 'protected' or are at war with the New World Order.

HOW THE GOVERNMENT HAS DECLARED WAR ON WHITE ENGLISH PEOPLE - Leo McKinstry

Written by Leo McKinstry August 2007

England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population.   

In the name of cultural diversity, Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed. In their own land, the English are being turned into second-class citizens.

This trend was highlighted this week by the case of Abigail Howarth, a bright teenager who applied for a training position with the Environment Agency in East Anglia but was turned down because she was too white and English. The post, which carries a £13,000 grant, was open only to ethnic minorities, including the Scots, Welsh and Irish.

Such social engineering was justified by the Agency on the grounds that minorities were under-represented in its workforce, the parrot cry used by bureaucrats throughout the public sector to justify bias against the English. Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique. This kind of reverse discrimination is now rife across the state machine, underwritten by the very English tax­payers who are the targets of institutional prejudice.

Blairs Legacy

17 U.S. States come out in support of Arizona's Immigration Law

Washington Post: Lawmakers across country taking immigration policy into own hands
Five states -- South Carolina, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Michigan -- are looking at Arizona-style legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. NDN, a Washington think tank and advocacy group, said lawmakers in 17 other states had expressed support for similar measures. Since it was adopted in April, the Arizona legislation, which gives law enforcement officers the power to check the immigration status of anyone suspected of being in the country illegally, has triggered bitter debate and been challenged in court by advocacy groups. LINK

Also, this mornings articles (see below) refer to The Council of Europe adopting clear opposition to what it describes as 'political extremism' which is seeking "national political expansion into other states under the disguise of Islam", and says that this "should be brought to light".

Well I'm bringing it to light in the hope that some twat in our poxy unelected dictatorial wet left wing  pathetic thing they call a government is listening. You know, the government which wants to take us all into poverty for an eternity whilst they give our money away to foreigners under the guise of 'aid'.

Oh, and of course don't forget former Australian prime Minister Kevin Rudd who last night said "this party is not lurching to the right on asylum seekers" just before he was ousted by one of his party and had to stand down.

I make that a straight win which puts nationalism at the top of the political tree at the moment in America, Britain, Europe and Australia, but alas will we see Cameroon Cameron knocked out of the cup before we are completely overrun with idiots like him. I doubt it.

Therefore, like they are in Australia and America, we people here will have to cause a bit of fuss to get our country back unless we want to see it lost forever to arseholes, new world order freaks, and to thieves, liars and traitors which put the people in this mess in the first place yet want us all to shut up about it for fear of upsetting their Islamic friends who are acknowledged as wanting to expand their extremism into other states under the guise of religion.

Are you listening Cameron?

Five states -- South Carolina, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Michigan -- are looking at Arizona-style legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. NDN, a Washington think tank and advocacy group, said lawmakers in 17 other states had expressed support for similar measures.

Since it was adopted in April, the Arizona legislation, which gives law enforcement officers the power to check the immigration status of anyone suspected of being in the country illegally, has triggered bitter debate and been challenged in court by advocacy groups. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said last week that the Justice Department plans to sue Arizona over the law, although a department spokesman has said the matter is under review.

This week, the spotlight shifted to rural Fremont, which narrowly passed an ordinance that would outlaw hiring illegal immigrants or renting property to them.

In the first three months of this year, legislators in 45 states introduced 1,180 bills or resolutions dealing with immigrants, an unprecedented number, according to the NCSL. By the end of March, 107 laws and 87 resolutions had been adopted by 34 states, with 38 bills pending. Not all of the proposals were designed to clamp down on illegal immigrants. Ann Morse, director of the Immigrant Policy Project at the NCSL, said they represented "a spectrum" of pro- and anti-immigration measures.

"When I talk to legislators about what they're doing in the state, they say this is their way of signaling they want federal immigration reform to happen -- that they care deeply about the issue, they're working within the parameters they have and sometimes at the edge, trying to get federal attention," she said.

Last month, the Massachusetts Senate amended its budget bill to require state contractors to confirm that their workers are in the country legally. Earlier, the Massachusetts House narrowly rejected a proposal to restrict public benefits to illegal immigrants.

In Pennsylvania, an Arizona-style bill is in the pipeline. Although police officers must have a separate reason to stop someone, the proposal would direct them to "attempt to verify the immigration status of suspected illegal aliens."

South Carolina is set to discuss an almost identical measure next year. And in Albuquerque, Mayor Richard Berry instituted a similar policy, which was upheld by a council vote.

Anti-illegal immigrant measures in Hazelton, Pa., and Farmers Branch, Tex., are being challenged in the courts.

In Fremont, those on both sides agreed that the town's new ordinance, which will take effect in July, marked a national pattern of local communities taking immigration policy into their own hands.

"I'm afraid this is part of a larger, nationwide trend, most obviously typified by what has happened in Arizona," said Amy Miller, the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Nebraska, which is seeking an injunction against the Fremont law. "There is no rational reason for Fremont to be worried about protecting our border. But it is a community, like many in rural Nebraska, where the only population growth has been in new immigrants, many of them people of color."

"What will this lead to? Other municipalities in other states enacting their own laws," said Fremont council member Sean Gitt, who said he decided to support the measure after it was approved by the community.

"Fremont is an example of 'If Washington won't, Nebraskans will,' " said Bob Dane, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which supports tougher immigration enforcement. Others note that the economy may determine whether other jurisdictions follow Arizona's lead.

"The big, overriding issue for nearly every state is the state of their budgets," said Morse. "Taking on additional law enforcement costs and court challenge costs is not at the front of their task list."

Rudd stands down as PM of Oz

"This party will not be lurching to the right on asylum seekers" Rudd said before being shot in the foot by his party which is facing elections.

Blah blah blah political mouthpieces the lot of them! 

The only duty of any government is to preserve and protect the country, its people, its culture and its economy on behalf of the people. Anything else they need the block on the back of their necks and can fuck right off! 

You listening Cameron?

Nationalists - The best form of defence is to attack

We nationalists have what you might call, 'a situation' and Nick Griffin needs to attack.

It's a situation which appears to be that we nationalists are always 'defending' what we see as a rightful cause to uphold the ideals of western civilisation, of our right to democratic control of politics, of  the preservation of our sovereignty as a people, and of the very essence of our history  as a people which brought us to the point where we could call ourselves the indigenous people of Britain.

All these things are in jeopardy of not only being eroded but of being completely obliterated by the powerful elite who control our lives. Yet we know they have no mandate from the people or any real premise on which to build an argument against our beliefs, for no elite since the dawn of time has ever been able to control the minds and will of their populace. We are many and they are few.

History tells us that such a thing is not only impossible but that it is also fraught with danger to the elite itself which perches itself on a self-made precipice without any real moral authority other than that which it gave itself simply because it could. Yet, our government was not elected.

An example of a very early attempt to control the populace which went badly wrong, is the story of Moses. 

Another, Jesus and his Christian disciples, another the Gauls who eventually sacked Rome, another the one time slave Spartacus who broke his chains and gathered an army, another the French revolution, another the Russian revolution, and so on and so on and so on, as this is the way mankind, has survived the scourge of oppression as they collectively decided never to be slaves but rather to be free.

Yet just as we know many cannot be led into slavery against their will, we also know that many are blind to its approach and have often willingly accepted it in their ignorance.  This has been as a result of fear, or of  greed, or from persuasion and tricks, or from the sheer weight of opposition against them, and I doubt this will ever change as there will perhaps always remain those amongst us who want to remain unenlightened and to remain with the ignorant belief that their  own world will be more comfortable if they just keep their mouths shut.

Then there are nationalists who will never accept the views of those who seek to create a one world government by an order of control with an  aim to end national sovereignty along with the obliteration of the very essence of who we are as well as our right to call ourselves indigenous.

This is not an 'idealism' or an ideology it is simply a scientific and political fact that we exist as indigenous people in free nations, yet there are those who seek to convince us otherwise as they attempt to stigmatize, insult and use outright state sponsored subversion and propaganda to stop the rise of freedom in our lands.

The recent case by the British govt which used its political and legal arms of the EHRC and appointed judges to break nationalism in Britain with its illicitly motivated actions against the British National Party, is a case in point. It reflects an overwhelming absorption of the government - those elites who placed themselves into power without mandate to 'smash the BNP' - in what amounts to a persecution in modern times which is no different to the tale of Moses or the others I mentioned.

The state wants you to think and act as it wants or you will be persecuted. It's really that simple and the path  of its own destruction is a forgone conclusion if history is to continue to repeat itself.

Now we have 'a situation' where the leaders of a political party are threatened with what amounts to a criminal action for holding a belief. 

A belief which I say is fundamental, it is factual and it is political, but is in stark contrast  to  the beliefs of those who bring the action, for only a communist or other demagogue  who is bent on appealing to the masses on the basis of his own prejudices, emotions and fears whilst using the arms of state along with its tools of propaganda could possibly augment such an undemocratic action whilst hailing himself to be prime minister when his position is not the subject result of the majority and is tenuous at best given the underlying crimes of ballot fraud which were perpetrated at that so called election.

The time to act as defenseless and helpless children is over when you can clearly see that persecution by the state is actually happening, that your route to democratic freedom is blocked, and as history shows us, the best form of defence is to attack.

Moses acted by gathering his people to lead them to the promised land. Spartacus did the same, but was caught and crucified. The Gauls raised an army to sack Rome, whereas the French and Russians revolted and took charge under the weight of people power.

They acted on their fundamental beliefs and they won victory as a result of their actions.

Today we have a legal system which if used properly should show political gain for freedom.

We have at our disposal the full weight of the Human Rights Act, the United Nations Charter on indigenous people's rights, 122 MP's in the last parliament who signed an Early Day Motion to acknowledge the rights of indigenous Britons, and we have the European Courts of Justice, notleast the ballot box itself which is a matter of legal contention as to whether there exists any mandate for the action, and a system of complaint against the government itself yet we remain defensive instead of using these places to attack.

Let us move forward in time a little here.

The scenario occurs where as a result of state persecution, nationalism is banned. i.e. It becomes illegal to be a patriot and illegal to argue the case (just as those 122 MPs did), to gain our fundamental rights which are in any event enshrined in the United Nations Charter and Human Rights Act as well as every morally superior thought which possessed free thinkers such as Moses and Spartacus who both held a fundamental belief that as a people seeking freedom their cause was justified. i.e. The choice to die on your knees as a slave or erect as a free man.

It happens to be the situation that Nick Griffin MEP could be jailed for his beliefs, yet will his beliefs suddenly evaporate if his body is moved from one place to another? Did the beliefs of Nelson Mandela fade in the 25 years he was imprisoned? I think not.

In fact if such a thing should happen then as history shows us Nick Griffin will stand to gain more support for his belief that freedom is a thing we need to hold on to lest it is killed by an elite who want only to control our thoughts and actions so we think what they would have us think in a society and a people which they own. 

This is not a democracy it is a thunderous regime of oppression where only those who obey can ever be left without stigma and persecution if they 'think' to be free.

It is of paramount importance that nationalists attack with every legal means at their disposal through the media, the legal systems and through those international bodies which are there for our protection otherwise we will remain the subjects of persecution and stigma in a state controlled myth which we would otherwise know as a democracy. 

Such actions if taken by these legal routes, will either bring more support or it will help others to see that the  very institutions which they think are there for their protection, are in fact part of the means government uses to suppress them. 

Mr Griffin needs to make a legal attack

If honest men like Nick Griffin and Simon Darby are to claim victory for our cause then they need help to attack the people who are persecuting every free man walking in Britain for the next one  to be persecuted for your thoughts will be you unless you stand with them in the cause to preserve the rights of men to think freely about their political beliefs.

Someone please tell me how The Council of Europe is able to say that Islam is political extremism disguised as religion, and that its "National political expansion into other states under the disguise of Islam should be brought to light", if those who agree with this interpretation are to be oppressed and persecuted for agreeing with it.

Doesn't the British govt agree with the Council of Europe, and if not then why?

Is it still possible to ask questions of government in this 'liberal' society  or maybe because it is not living up to its own rhetoric but is rather feeding the populace propaganda, lies and deceit just like in the times of Moses, it is with fear of persecution we ask such questions.

Is it unacceptable for me to ask why a politician should attach himself to a criminal gang calling itself Unite Against Fascism, and to 'Operation Black Vote', in a society which is said to be multicultural or is it appropriate for me to ask why if that politician feels it acceptable to sign up for Operation Black Vote, why we cannot have an Operation White Vote too. After all, they are the ones - David Cameron and Nick Clegg - who are making the distinction on colour in politics which I think needs to be brought out in a legal attack or in the course of defence to any action which may or may not arise in future as a result of state sponsored persecution by the EHRC against the indigenous people of Britain.

Kill Switch Would Kill The Internet - by Bob Livingston

June 23, 2010 by Bob Livingston

Relax!

It’s always a comforting feeling when the fascists tell you to relax. And that’s what Senator Joe Leiberman (I-Conn.) told everyone to do Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union with Candy Crowley.

Crowley asked about the Kill Switch bill Leiberman co-sponsors with Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) that would allow the President to shut down the Internet in a time of emergency.

The President will never take over the Internet, Leiberman—with a warm smile—assured the audience. The government shouldn’t take over the internet. The president would only do that in catastrophic times. Not going to do it every day. It’s only for national security. Relax. “Right now China—the government—can disconnect parts of its Internet in a case of war. We need to have the ability to do that, too,” Leiberman said.

Of course, in China the government runs over its people with tanks. It drags them off to prisons without trial for practicing Christianity or saying something government doesn’t like, where they disappear forever—probably with a bullet in the brain. I wonder if Lieberman thinks our government should have those abilities as well. China also censors the Internet—every day—to stifle the free flow of information… because it can.

Islam wants to take over Europe - Council on Europe says

It's funny to see a headline which leads the reader to believe that an entirely different set of circumstance occurred in the Council of Europe. 

The headline (see below), clearly draws attention to an opposition to the banning of Muslim veils, yet  on reading the article it gives an entirely different account of it, saying: 'The veiling tradition "could be a threat to women's dignity and freedom" and "no woman should be compelled to wear religious apparel by her community or family", and that they 'could be banned when public security or professional obligations required women to show their faces'.

What is it to be then, a ban or not a ban?

Secondly, it called on Muslims in Europe "to abandon any traditional interpretations of Islam which deny gender equality and limit women's rights ... Women are equal to men in all respects and must be treated accordingly."

That sounds to me like a telling off of Islam, and a request for the near impossible, that Islam should abandon its own teachings. Don't these idiots have anything better to do than to sit around in their unelected positions, 'preaching' their views to the rest of society as if on some high ground whilst ignoring those same people who for years have told them that Islamic and Christian cultures are  in the main incompatible with one another except perhaps between the elites of society who care nothing about the rest of us let alone our right in a democracy to choose. 

I point out that this boil on democracy which places itself to speak for us, has said it 'deplores' the result of a referendum in Switzerland which banned minarets. (Hello, have you heard of democracy)?

But the most ominous thing I read was - "The objectives of such organisations insert [Islamics], are hence not religious. National political expansion into other states under the disguise of Islam should be brought to light.", and that....The resolution said many Muslims in Europe "lack adequate knowledge of Islam, let alon[e] other religions, which can make them vulnerable to 'Islamism' as a religiously disguised form of political extremism."

The Council of Europe says that many Muslims lack adequate knowledge of Islam. i.e. They are ignorant of its teachings and are also ignorant of other religions. That's about as close as you would get to saying Europe is being taken over by ignorant religious extremists who know nothing about our culture or of their own susceptibility to the teachings of a political doctrine which masquerades as a religion, and that people should quickly educate themselves before we become another Islamic nation, because it wants to take over Europe POLITICALLY. So why not just say that and use the headline I did?

I didn't need to ask why the headline was showing an opposition to a ban of veils, when I realised that the article was written for Reuters.

The article:

Council of Europe opposes bans on Muslim face veils

General Stanley McChrystal - Busted for telling the truth

General Stanley McChrystal

pdf of Rolling Stone article - 'Runaway General', featuring 4 star General Stanley McChrystal.

They can say a lot about him, but that he ever ran away from anything, isn't one of them.

General McChrystal resigned following the article being made public.

As I see it, he simply speaks the truth about how he feels and has been carpeted by politicians who think more about the suits and desks they occupy than they do about winning a battle.

General McChrystal told them straight and was busted for it, yet by all accounts the troops under his command are dedicated to him.

He often fought alongside his men at the front of the battle zone, and despite his infamy for speaking his mind as opposed to following protocol like a tin pot General, unlike politicians, McChrystal has shown vision,  bold leadership, an aim to get the job done, and the guts to do it.

Yet given General McChrystal's personality and history as a U.S. soldier. if the U.S. Administration had a problem with a guy speaking his mind, then it was Obama's fault for choosing him to lead NATO operations in Afghanistan. Didn't Obama ever read his file? Because on all accounts, General McChrystal's operational history as related in part by the article, placed him alongside the likes of General George S Patton who despite him having made many political gaffes, he got the job done in Europe by breaking protocol.

Afghanistan lost a fine General when they lost McChrystal and it may just bring about a wind of change which will have greater results than the loss of one General in Afghanistan. His sacking could lead to the loss of initiative in Afghanistan, cost lives, and could eventually be the catalyst to bring down Obama's own administration as talk of victory has since been replaced with 'progress' with little or no explanation of what that progress actually is.

Read article in pdf below

Lunatic Cop says the truth will 'Harm Community Cohesion"

I'm talking about a cop who took a guy to court and wasted taxpayers money on a jury trial because the guy drew attention to the illegal trade of narcotics in Britain.

I'm talking about a dumb cop who thinks his opinion counts for anything other than diddly squat after a jury and a judge found his illicitly arrested defendant, NOT GUILTY!

I'm talking about a lunatic cop who mixes his job up as preaching political correctness to taxpayers who pay his freaking wages, instead of catching the crooks who traffic drugs!

That cop needs shifting to another department where he can learn something about society. Perhaps he needs to be sacked and made to live near the heroin and drug addicts which ARE ruining his damn community cohesion along with the REAL lives of PEOPLE, as opposed to being all politically correct about how they do it.

That lunatic cop is the epitome of everything that is wrong in our society, where a cop can unwillingly accept the judgment of a court which has found the defendant NOT GUILTY, yet still preach his worthless PC shit to us as if he holds moral superiority in OUR society.

If Muslims happen to be growing, farming, making, and selling drugs in Britain, then he should deal with that by arresting them and denouncing them, as opposed to claiming shit like truth will damage community cohesion.

Sack that Cop!

Same shit in our British Democracy

Same shit, same shit, same shit, from the same politicians who are shit, in our British Democracy.

Message for the West (from Sweden)

An email report directed me to news from Sweden yesterday which basically makes a pigs ear of the beneficial effects of mass immigration, which in Sweden's case has schools and police stations razed to the ground by arsonists, firemen in need of police protection, ambulance drivers told by Islamic gang lords to 'stay out of our community', and teachers with 1,000 pupils of which only 2 are Swedes.

I did a video about it so as to produce a 'message for the west', in particular Britain and America, of what we have to come unless people like Nick Griffin MEP are listened to and voted for. For without a nationalist lead on this situation which will protect first our own way of life, then I'm afraid we have a third world event about to occur on our very own western doorsteps.

The video is followed by an article from the London Patriot which managed to write about it before I did.

All European countries are run by corrupt and treacherous elites, committed to destroying national identities via third-world mass immigration, political correctness and race-hate laws, and the persecution of anyone that dares oppose this platform

Sweden is such an example of this. ‘The Local’

Once an ethnically homogeneous country with low crime and no social tension, Sweden has become a multiracial hell-hole, mainly due to the huge number of Muslims and African immigrants allowed to settle there by leftist politicians wishing to make Sweden more diverse.

The effect of this enrichment is evident in the number of violent crimes (in particular rape) committed by those invited invaders against the native Swedes.

Other instances are the frequent riots carried out by young Muslims whenever they feel they have been ‘disrespected’.

The latest riot reported occured in the Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby on the night of the 8th of June when 50-60 youths pelted police with stones and set light to a building.

“It is a war zone out here, it is raining stones”, said one witness who wished to remain anonymous.

According to another witness a bus trying to enter the deprived area was forced to stop.

“Not a single window on the bus was intact,” an eye witness said.

Police were told something was afoot earlier in the evening as youths gathered on the streets arming themselves with paving stones.

“They did all they could to attract our attention,” said Mats Brännlund at Stockholm police.

But police decided to react first when a building housing a mentor programme for young people in the area, burst into flames.

“We had to help the emergency services to get through,” Brännlund said.

In total around 20 police patrols with dogs were present in the area throughout the night as they tried to restore calm. Police vehicles were also subjected to stone throwing.

“If you attack the police with stones and set buildings alight then I would venture to suggest that it can be classified as rioting,” he said.

The fire services deployed 21 staff from three fire stations at the location.

A branch of the Nordea bank was attacked at around midnight with the local police station also being the target of stone throwing youths. Two men were detained in connection with the police station attack.

According to media reports on the cause of the outbreak of violence, it may have been the reaction to an argument at a party in the area earlier in the evening, but these reports have not been confirmed by police.

A couple of months before, another riot erupted in the Malmö district of Rosengård with police forced to seal off the area before regaining control of the situation.

Some 20 police units, a total of 50 officers were deployed to the troubled Malmö suburb in an attempt to calm the situation as around 20 youths rampaged through the district leaving behind them incidents of fires and the vandalisation of property.

“We have concluded that there were a total of five fires. A couple of cars, as well as a recycling station, were some of the things burning,” Peter Martinsson at Skåne police told the ‘Dagens Nyheter’ daily.

Police were called to the area in the vicinity of Ramels väg in Rosengård at around 9pm. Residents of the area had become concerned about gangs of youths, and feared fighting would break out.

Fire fighters were obliged to seek a police escort as they were subjected to stone throwing whilst battling to put out the fires in various parts of the district.

Sound familiar?

In Sweden just like France, and in Britain a few days ago, Muslim youths think they are entitled to use violence toward anyone they believe responsible for their problems.

As is usual in these cases it is common to hear brain dead bleeding heart liberals moaning about how unfairly the Muslims are treated, and how little government does to help them, and of course accusing the Police ‘service’ of being racist.

The truth as we all know is that these Muslim youths should not be in Europe in the first place, because no one asked the native Britons, Swedes, French and other Europeans if they wanted to be invaded by third-world immigrants. (By the way there is no such thing as a legal asylum seeker)

In the UK, recently disclosed documents prove that Labour had planned mass immigration to make Britain multicultural even though they knew that native Britons were strongly opposed to it.

The same is true of Sweden and that is why we won’t rest until this invasion is stopped and reversed, and the politicians who wanted it are put on trial for treason.

Article by: GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS for The London Patriot

.

SEX at the Taxpayers Expense.

Call me a prude or call me anything you like but when I used to think about politicians I used to think they were elected to our parliament to serve us rather than their own sordid desires.

It was only a day or two after they cobbled a government together from the unelected filth at that place we call parliament, that  MP David Laws was outed  after being caught  fiddling his expenses for 10 years whilst having a homosexual relationship with a lobbyist.

Next we had the outing of the right dishonorable Chris Huhne, yet another minister of depravity who can't lie straight in bed apparently, with him having been evidenced as having an extra-marital affair with yet another lobbyist for the last year and a half during which time he sat pontificating on Question Time and other places with his nose stuck in the air taking moral superiority over the likes of us filthy ignorant people.

And today we learn of yet another MP, a Mrs Caroline Nokes, who whilst singing how Christian she is and how morally high she is, has been caught with a camera having an affair with estranged Tory councillor James Dinsdale. In fact the camera caught what you'd expect to catch if you spied on two adults in bed together, but the fact she found it 'boring' in parliament and made a beeline instead to bed with her Tory pal at the taxpayers expense, is more the problem than what two halfwits get up to whether they be shafting each other up the arse or doing it straight.

They all took taxpayers money and they all lied, and that is the only reason why they should be sacked.

These people do not have the moral decency to conduct their lives with honor or in truth, they are simply liars and thieves. Thieves because they paid their bills with taxpayers money and liars because they told lies to their partners or to the country.

So here we are again, back to the salacious parliament I thought we'd gotten rid of with a coward at the top who won't take any action because he is one of them.

They are filth the lot of them but nothing will happen because they are all glued together by the lies they tell! All they do is make scandal and money at the taxpayers expense whilst driving taxpayers into the dirt and telling us how to think, act and behave from their morally high pedestals.

Political expediency of the worst kind by a coward and a traitor

This piece of filth we have in government who calls itself a leader and a prime minister, seems to have a few screws loose when it comes to opening his mouth in public when he 'demands' the British people should do more to show their support for our troops.

He commends those who stand in Wootton Basset each week to respect those brave soldiers whose bodies are returning from Afghanistan in boxes, yet when ISLAM4UK were saying they would protest at the 'murderers' return, Cameron never uttered a word to them about his 'demands'.

Instead, he castigated Mr Nick Griffin MEP along with British Nationalists as  being 'ghastly filth' when THEY alone showed their support for our troops and protested over the illegal war, which Cameron supports along with giving his unpatriotic support to aliens who see our brave troops rather than Cameron and his cronies as murderers.

This piece of filth who elected himself into the role of prime minister must have a screw loose when he calls upon the nation to support an illegal war in Afghanistan, whilst he ignores the people's protests over that war, the Iraqi invasion and the senseless murderous shelling and occupation of Serbia.

This piece of filth would twist truth to its bitter end just to remain in power but he can never have power over the minds of the British people, and certainly never will have any power over the minds of patriots.

So whilst Cameron is on his glory trip, miles away in Afghanistan, and far away from the incendiary devices and Taliban strongholds in his nice cosy spot surrounded by brave men and women who stand as guards, he might just like to consider asking why those troops over there were prevented from voting in the elections. 

He might do well to ask why he and his filthy cronies did not make any outcry in support of their fundamental right to have a say in their country which may have prevented filth like Cameron taking a role in government.

Needless to say, our troops are very precious to us. Yet British Nationalists cannot stand on the streets giving their support because Cameron and his filthy pieces of hammer throwing shit UAF will be out there in force along with the filthy pieces of shit we call a media, and will like they always do be twisting our support into yet more lies and propaganda which suggests it is we the British people who are aliens in our own country rather than the crooks in government and the filth who shout 'murderer' to our troops when they return 'home'.

Cameron, you are the lowest form of scum I can think of right now and the shit coming out of your mouth is testament to that.

You are a traitor to your people and you are also the biggest coward walking the planet.

If you want to make political gain, then you should recall our troops from Afghanistan and you should castigate those who call our brave forces 'murderers' when they return. You should deport those who do not represent the British people and that includes yourself and your cronies who voted FOR an illegal war simply to protect drug trafficking in Afghanistan.

Ask the people about what they want and less of your filthy demands Cameron, and you might get somewhere. Meanwhile, you have no right and no mandate to speak for the British people who you do not represent and never will for the British people and especially patriots, can see through your lies and hypocrisy like looking through glass.

By the way, this is only a guess here of course, but I guess since you failed to secure a big enough vote to make a government, that it is you who we should be making 'demands' on when it comes to running this country and making your filthy 'demands' upon the people of this nation is seen purely for what it is. i.e. - Political expediency of the worst kind by a coward and a traitor.

Oath Keepers and Patriots we are not alone

Where oaths are sworn and preserved because they have meaning

10 orders U.S. Marines will not obey

About Oath Keepers:

Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, veterans, and peace officers who will fulfill the oath we swore to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God.

Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the President, and we will not obey unconstitutional (and thus illegal) and immoral orders, such as orders to disarm the American people or to place them under martial law and deprive them of their ancient right to jury trial. We Oath Keepers have drawn a line in the sand. We will not just follow orders."

Our motto is Not on our watch! 

The 10 Orders We WILL NOT Obey:

1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.

2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control.”

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.

10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html

Daniel Estulin address EU Parliament on Bilderberg - Full Version

50 European media reporters attended the meeting but no British media covered it.

Watch Daniel Estulin informs EU Parliament about Bilderberg in Activism & Non-Profit  |  View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com

Daniel addresses the meeting in English about 2 minutes in after his introduction.

He says: "We are all patriots and they are all traitors not just to nations but to humanity as a whole".

Rockefeller confronted by Patriots

We Are Change (WACEIRE) in Ireland, confront David Rockefeller at the Tri-Lateral Commission's visit to Ireland in May 2010.

The Tri-Lateral Commission is the working group of the Bilderberg Group which includes Japan. The Bildeberg Group decides the fate of Europe and America which includes the Council on Foreign Relations which set an agenda called 'Project 1980's' to plan controlled disintegration of western economies.

Excerpt: LINK

Barely known, is that Federal Reserve Chairman Greenspan's predecessor, Paul Volcker, in 1979, actually instituted a policy of "controlled disintegration." The New Federalist and Executive Intelligence Review, (EIR) are the only publications of note, which, over the years, have exposed and discussed this bombshell, at length. In a recent issue of EIR, writer Richard Freeman, says "that this policy was to serve as a cornerstone of a major policy shift in the United States.

The purpose was to level the physical economy of the wider world economy, with particularly destructive effects in the U.S."

Freeman explains that the British started the implementation of this policy in the late 1960s, with acceleration during the 70s-80s. Your writer saw with alarm the effects of those policies a decade ago on a visit. Thoughtful observers returning to Britain in those years, experienced the drastic and negative effects, what seemed a determined change for the worst. Why else would a nation enjoying great wealth fall into this measure of unwarranted deprivation and decadence? The breakdown continues to this day. First, uncontrolled free trade destroyed Britain's strong base of manufacture, then went her mines and ship yards, then the U.K. experienced the society debilitating "deregulated" energy policies with its high prices and inefficiencies, long before California unceremoniously woke up to the shocking, sky high energy bills and the grand fraud now more deeply imbedded in their own deregulated energy department.

Estulin - Bilderberg are "terrified" that 'people are beginning to lose their fear'

Daniel Estulin addresses the European Union

"Bilderberg must be stopped"

MORE WITH ESTULIN ABOUT BILDERBERG