Who went to this festival and what did they feast on? I wrote about this political rally a few months back so I thought I'd resurrect it now the date has passed."Marxism Festival 2010", and my what a lovely celebration that must have been. I checked through the
list of speakers and frankly it blew my mind to see that the people who put themselves up as all saintly, good and clean as far as politics goes, are of the same mentality as the people in this video which my friend
extant sent me as he wanted others to watch it too, to see what we're really up against if wanting to live in a modern democratic society.
If the Marxist festival was not infiltrated, recorded, and documented by alternative political idealists 'not' bent on mass genocide and the extermination of man in order to raise their 'new man'. Then I think I might be fighting a bit of a losing battle here on my own. Obviously no one can fight this lot on their own and given this festival was full of people who want to overthrow the state along with our culture and anyone who stands against them, then I think it was quite essential for normal people to have gotten a plant into the place. If that didn't happen, then clearly we have a long way to go in politics before we can relate to any particular party as being capable of providing a real alternative, especially if it spends more time fighting itself than it does what is constituted to be 'the enemy'.
Further, If there were any reporters or other political analysts in attendance at that festival, then could it be that they did not report it because they are part of it. And could it be that the only way to deal with the consequences of the actions of this group of dropouts, criminals and immigrants, is by means of civil war.
But surely that's where we always knew we'd end up really anyway if you think about it. I don't know. Maybe it's all just part of a big Marxist plot to have us think that way, but one thing is certainly sure. These fellas mean business. They want the world and everything in it, and they won't take no for an answer. Stand in their way and you could end up on the wrong end of one of Weyman Bennets bricks, clubs, rocks or metal railing spikes. Oh, that reminds me. What the devil happened with
Weyman Bennet's court case, and why is Prime Minister David Cameron supporting him? When did the Tory Party become a party of radical Marxists and Misfits?
It was Karl Marx who actually began the concept of modern genocide. Nazism is a combination of conservative socialism & liberal socialism, both of which have their roots in Marxism.
Karl Marx is the hero of some labor union leaders and civil-rights organizations, including those who organized the recent protest against proposed immigration legislation. It's easy to be a Marxist if you haven't read his writings. Most people agree that Marx's predictions about capitalism turned out to be dead wrong.
What most people don't know is that Marx was an out and out racist and anti-Semite. He didn't think much of Mexicans. Concerning the annexation of California after the Mexican-American War, Marx wrote: "Without violence, nothing is ever accomplished in history." Then he asks, "Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?" Friedrich Engels, Marx's co-author of the "Manifesto of the Communist Party," added, "In America, we have witnessed the conquest of Mexico and have rejoiced at it. It is to the interest of its own development that Mexico will be placed under the tutelage of the United States." Much of Marx's ideas can be found in a book written by former communist Nathaniel Weyl, titled "Karl Marx, Racist" (1979).
In a July 1862 letter to Engels, in reference to his socialist political competitor, Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote, "... it is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother had not interbred with a nigger. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product. The obtrusiveness of the fellow is also nigger-like."
Engels shared much of Marx's racial philosophy. In 1887, Paul Lafargue, who was Marx's son-in-law, was a candidate for a council seat in a Paris district that contained a zoo. Engels claimed that Paul had "one-eighth or one-twelfth nigger blood." In an April 1887 letter to Paul's wife, Engels wrote, "Being in his quality as a nigger, a degree nearer to the rest of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, he is undoubtedly the most appropriate representative of that district."
Though few claim him as their own, such as leftists claim Karl Marx, Thomas Carlyle is another unappreciated historical figure. Carlyle is best-known for giving economics the derogatory name "dismal science," an inversion of the phrase "gay science," which at the time (1849) referred to life-enhancing knowledge. Most people have incorrectly learned that the term "dismal science" had its origins in reference to Thomas Malthus' gloomy predictions that the global population would grow faster than food supplies, condemning mankind to perpetual poverty and starvation. George Mason University professor Davy Levy, and his co-author, Sandra Peart, tell the true story in their 2001 book, "The Secret History of the Dismal Science: Economics, Religion and Race in the 19th Century."
Carlyle first used the term "dismal science" in his 1849 pamphlet entitled "An Occasional Discourse on the Nigger Question." He attacked the ideas of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other free market, limited-government economists for their belief in the fundamental equality of man and their anti-slavery positions. The fact that economics assumes that people are all the same and are equally deserving of liberty was offensive to Carlyle and led him to call economics the dismal science. Carlyle argued that blacks were subhuman, "two-legged cattle," who needed the tutelage of whites wielding the "beneficent whip" if they were to contribute to the good of society. Carlyle was by no means alone in denouncing economics for its anti-slavery and pro-equality position.
No less a historical figure and a Christmastime favorite, Charles Dickens, author of "A Christmas Carol," shared Carlyle's positions on slavery and blacks as subhuman.
Marx, Engels, Carlyle and Dickens all share one belief prevalent throughout mankind's history down to today: the belief that some people are endowed with superior intelligence and wisdom, and they've been ordained to forcibly impose that wisdom on the masses.
Hat tip: extant
P.S. David Cameron supports the Marxist Group UAF.
Who is David Cameron fighting for?
